<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<measures><measure><type>Main</type><parent-measure></parent-measure><title>Total number of complaint letters regarding promotion materials reviewed in the month</title><dictionary>OPDP is tracking the number of complaint letters regarding prescription drug promotion that it receives and reviews each month.  OPDP’s objective is to review and acknowledge complaint letters within 30 days of their receipt and to further investigate complaints that appear to have merit.  Complaint letters aid in the discovery of illegal promotional activities; the prompt review and acknowledgement of complaints will help encourage the submission of further valuable information by complainants.  This in turn can serve as the first step in the action needed to identify and stop future misleading promotion.</dictionary>
<dictionary>&lt;br&gt;These measures have been retired as CDER has created new measures for FY13 which align to their four functional areas of 1) Regulatory Review and Drug Safety, 2) Drug Quality and Compliance, 3) Transparency and Public Outreach, and 4) Regulatory Science Research. &lt;/b&gt;</dictionary>
<measure-description>Number</measure-description><chart-type></chart-type><chart-color></chart-color><right-min>0</right-min><right-max>100</right-max><fiscal-year><chart-min></chart-min><chart-max></chart-max><title>2010</title><target-header></target-header><target-description></target-description><summary>FY 2010 Total: 141</summary><time><frame>Oct 2009</frame><target></target><value>8</value></time><time><frame>Nov 2009</frame><target></target><value>5</value></time><time><frame>Dec 2009</frame><target></target><value>11</value></time><time><frame>Jan 2010</frame><target></target><value>6</value></time><time><frame>Feb 2010</frame><target></target><value>5</value></time><time><frame>Mar 2010</frame><target></target><value>16</value></time><time><frame>Apr 2010</frame><target></target><value>8</value></time><time><frame>May 2010</frame><target></target><value>22</value></time><time><frame>Jun 2010</frame><target></target><value>16</value></time><time><frame>Jul 2010</frame><target></target><value>15</value></time><time><frame>Aug 2010</frame><target></target><value>20</value></time><time><frame>Sep 2010</frame><target></target><value>9</value></time></fiscal-year><fiscal-year><chart-min></chart-min><chart-max></chart-max><title>2011</title><target-header></target-header><target-description></target-description><summary>FY 2011 Total: 117</summary><time><frame>Oct 2010</frame><target></target><value>12</value></time><time><frame>Nov 2010</frame><target></target><value>13</value></time><time><frame>Dec 2010</frame><target></target><value>8</value></time><time><frame>Jan 2011</frame><target></target><value>7</value></time><time><frame>Feb 2011</frame><target></target><value>7</value></time><time><frame>Mar 2011</frame><target></target><value>10</value></time><time><frame>Apr 2011</frame><target></target><value>12</value></time><time><frame>May 2011</frame><target></target><value>16</value></time><time><frame>Jun 2011</frame><target></target><value>6</value></time><time><frame>Jul 2011</frame><target></target><value>8</value></time><time><frame>Aug 2011</frame><target></target><value>11</value></time><time><frame>Sep 2011</frame><target></target><value>7</value></time></fiscal-year><fiscal-year><chart-min></chart-min><chart-max></chart-max><title>2012</title><target-header></target-header><target-description></target-description><summary>FY 2012 YTD: 29</summary><time><frame>Oct 2011</frame><target></target><value>7</value></time><time><frame>Nov 2011</frame><target></target><value>16</value></time><time><frame>Dec 2011</frame><target></target><value>6</value></time><time><frame>Jan 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Feb 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Mar 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Apr 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>May 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Jun 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Jul 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Aug 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Sep 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time></fiscal-year></measure><related-links><link><url>http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/Transparency/track/ucm206444.htm</url><text>FDA-TRACK CDER Dashboard</text></link></related-links><measure><type>Sub</type><parent-measure>Total number of complaint letters regarding promotion materials reviewed in the month</parent-measure><title>Percentage of complaint letters reviewed within 30 days</title><dictionary></dictionary><measure-description>Percent</measure-description><chart-type></chart-type><chart-color></chart-color><right-min>0</right-min><right-max>100</right-max><fiscal-year><chart-min>0</chart-min><chart-max>100</chart-max><title>2010</title><target-header></target-header><target-description></target-description><summary></summary><time><frame>Oct 2009</frame><target></target><value>88</value></time><time><frame>Nov 2009</frame><target></target><value>60</value></time><time><frame>Dec 2009</frame><target></target><value>55</value></time><time><frame>Jan 2010</frame><target></target><value>50</value></time><time><frame>Feb 2010</frame><target></target><value>80</value></time><time><frame>Mar 2010</frame><target></target><value>81</value></time><time><frame>Apr 2010</frame><target></target><value>88</value></time><time><frame>May 2010</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Jun 2010</frame><target></target><value>94</value></time><time><frame>Jul 2010</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Aug 2010</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Sep 2010</frame><target></target><value>89</value></time></fiscal-year><fiscal-year><chart-min>0</chart-min><chart-max>100</chart-max><title>2011</title><target-header></target-header><target-description></target-description><summary></summary><time><frame>Oct 2010</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Nov 2010</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Dec 2010</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Jan 2011</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Feb 2011</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Mar 2011</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Apr 2011</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>May 2011</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Jun 2011</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Jul 2011</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Aug 2011</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Sep 2011</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time></fiscal-year><fiscal-year><chart-min></chart-min><chart-max>100</chart-max><title>2012</title><target-header></target-header><target-description></target-description><summary></summary><time><frame>Oct 2011</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Nov 2011</frame><target></target><value>94</value></time><time><frame>Dec 2011</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Jan 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Feb 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Mar 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Apr 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>May 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Jun 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Jul 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Aug 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Sep 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time></fiscal-year></measure><measure><type>Sub</type><parent-measure>Total number of complaint letters regarding promotion materials reviewed in the month</parent-measure><title>Percentage of complaint letters reviewed in the month appearing to have merit</title><dictionary></dictionary><measure-description>Percent</measure-description><chart-type></chart-type><chart-color></chart-color><right-min>0</right-min><right-max>100</right-max><fiscal-year><chart-min>0</chart-min><chart-max>100</chart-max><title>2010</title><target-header></target-header><target-description></target-description><summary></summary><time><frame>Oct 2009</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Nov 2009</frame><target></target><value>80</value></time><time><frame>Dec 2009</frame><target></target><value>91</value></time><time><frame>Jan 2010</frame><target></target><value>67</value></time><time><frame>Feb 2010</frame><target></target><value>80</value></time><time><frame>Mar 2010</frame><target></target><value>88</value></time><time><frame>Apr 2010</frame><target></target><value>88</value></time><time><frame>May 2010</frame><target></target><value>64</value></time><time><frame>Jun 2010</frame><target></target><value>94</value></time><time><frame>Jul 2010</frame><target></target><value>93</value></time><time><frame>Aug 2010</frame><target></target><value>70</value></time><time><frame>Sep 2010</frame><target></target><value>78</value></time></fiscal-year><fiscal-year><chart-min>0</chart-min><chart-max>100</chart-max><title>2011</title><target-header></target-header><target-description></target-description><summary></summary><time><frame>Oct 2010</frame><target></target><value>75</value></time><time><frame>Nov 2010</frame><target></target><value>93</value></time><time><frame>Dec 2010</frame><target></target><value>75</value></time><time><frame>Jan 2011</frame><target></target><value>100</value></time><time><frame>Feb 2011</frame><target></target><value>86</value></time><time><frame>Mar 2011</frame><target></target><value>70</value></time><time><frame>Apr 2011</frame><target></target><value>83</value></time><time><frame>May 2011</frame><target></target><value>73</value></time><time><frame>Jun 2011</frame><target></target><value>83</value></time><time><frame>Jul 2011</frame><target></target><value>63</value></time><time><frame>Aug 2011</frame><target></target><value>73</value></time><time><frame>Sep 2011</frame><target></target><value>86</value></time></fiscal-year><fiscal-year><chart-min></chart-min><chart-max>100</chart-max><title>2012</title><target-header></target-header><target-description></target-description><summary></summary><time><frame>Oct 2011</frame><target></target><value>71</value></time><time><frame>Nov 2011</frame><target></target><value>81</value></time><time><frame>Dec 2011</frame><target></target><value>67</value></time><time><frame>Jan 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Feb 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Mar 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Apr 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>May 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Jun 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Jul 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Aug 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time><time><frame>Sep 2012</frame><target></target><value></value></time></fiscal-year></measure></measures>਍††਍਍਍਍਍਍਍