Quick Links: Skip to main page content
Skip to Search
Skip to Topics Menu
Skip to Common Links
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
A to Z Index
Follow FDA
FDA Voice Blog
Enter Search terms
Most Popular Searches
Home
Food
Drugs
Medical Devices
Radiation-Emitting Products
Vaccines, Blood & Biologics
Animal & Veterinary
Cosmetics
Tobacco Products
The Paper Trail - Detail
FDA Home
The Paper Trail
Detail
-
Please note:
JavaScript must be enabled for this application to work properly.
Check your settings
if you are unsure if your JavaScript is enabled.
Article, Chapter, or Book Title:
Assessing product bioequivalence for extended-release formulations and drugs with long half-lives
Author(s):
Gehring R and Martinez MN
Year:
2012
Month:
Mar
Journal Abbrev, Book Title, or Conference:
J Vet Pharmacol Therap
Journal Full Name:
Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Volume:
35
Start Page:
3
End Page:
9
Key Words:
veterinary, extended-release, pharmacokinetics, immediate release, AUC, Tmax, Cmax, drug absorption, elimination, formulation
Abstract:
When a drug product remains in the body for a duration of hours or days, estimating the extent of drug exposure is relatively straightforward. For immediate release (IR) dosage forms, the peak drug concentration (Cmax) and time to peak concentrations (Tmax) are typically adequate for comparing product rates of drug absorption. However, unique complexities need to be addressed when a drug remains in the system for a duration of months or years. Specifically, if the long duration of exposure is attributable to formulation effects, Cmax and Tmax may not be adequate to compare the rate of drug absorption, especially when there are multiphasic absorption processes. In this case, it may be appropriate to use partial (segmented areas) for comparing product profiles. However, the decision of how the curves are segmented is not straightforward. Points to consider are discussed in this manuscript. Alternatively, if the long half-life is due to the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the active pharmaceutical ingredient and not to formulation effects, Cmax and Tmax may be appropriate metrics for the rate of absorption but decisions regarding the duration of blood sampling needed to capture the AUC should be based upon an assessment of the inherent variability in drug absorption and elimination. Furthermore, it is important to be confident that the absorption phase is complete. In this manuscript, we explore some of the difficulties associated with determining optimal metrics for comparing the rate and extent of product release for long half life drugs when the long duration of exposure is attributable to either the inherent drug PK or to formulation effects.
-
-