• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services


  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC | Inspections

Model Number 102
Event Date 01/01/2004
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description

Reporter indicated that vns patient was experiencing episodes of asystole. The cause of the episodes is unknown. The patient was subsequently implanted with a pacemaker. The patient's vns therapy system was programmed to off prior to the pacemaker implant surgery and was programmed to on at certain points during the pacemaker implant surgery to assess whether the vns therapy affected the pacemaker sensing capabilities. When the pacemaker leads were implanted and connected to monitoring equipment, the vns therapy system was programmed to on at 1. 0ma output current. There were no changes to the monitoring equipment while the device was programmed to on at 1. 0ma output current. Normal mode output current was then increased from 1. 0ma to 2. 0ma with no changes to the monitoring equipment. Due to patient discomfort, the vns therapy system was programmed back to 0ma after approximately 10 seconds. The pacemaker battery was then implanted and connected to the pacemaker leads. The vns therapy system was then programmed to on at 3. 5ma normal mode output current in order to test the vns generator with the pacemaker and the pacemaker's monitoring equipment. After approximately 10 seconds, the vns therapy system was programmed back to off. Upon completion of the pacemaker implant surgery, the vns therapy system was interrogated to confirm that the device was programmed to off (0ma output current). Investigation to date has been unable to determine whether a relationship exists between the episodes of asystole and the vns therapy system. The patient's neurologist indicated that he was not aware of the patient having cardiac problems prior to the vns implant.

Event Description

Further follow-up (discharge summay dated 2004) revealed that the pt originally received the vns system so that he coul reduce the medications he was taking. The vns did not appear to help, and the pt reportedly began to have recurring and more-frequent events. The pt reported that 80% of the seizures are without warming and 20% are preceded by the sensation of jejavu. The pt feels "generally not right" and has difficulty breathing. He will suddenly stop what he is doing and become pale. His lips will turn blue and he will fall from standing. He denies any convusions. The episodes last 20-30 seconds, sometimes accompanied by brief myoclonus and followed by postictal confusion of 1-20 minutes. There is frequent urinay incontinence but rarely bowel incontinence. The pt was admitted to the impatient monitoring svc to better identify and classify his events for the initial evaluatio of possible surgical intervention. The pt was placed on continuous video-eeg monitoring. He had normal waking background alpha frequency of 11 hz with normal drowsiness and sleep stages identified. The pt had normal, if any, identifable interictal epileptiform discharges. He had several clinical events recorded. The pt had an event where he went from his prior sinus heart rate to a progressive bradycardia,culminating in a 15-second pause that was followed by generalized flattering of the eeg background, followed by some generalized delta events. After this event a cardiology consult was obtained. This was the event that prompted the initial medwatch report. There was concern that the vns system may have contributed to the event, therefore, the vns device was deactivated. Because the pt had the vns device for quite sometime before the asystole event, it was felt by the epilepsy svc to be exceedingly unlikely that the vns device contributed to the episode of asystole. Following the initial event, the pt had several more events, though none were accompanied by significant asystole. It was reported that the episode of asystole may have been triggered by a subtle seizure activity involving the frontal lobe, and there was no way to guarantee that this would not recur. The vns device was not turned back on at this point and it is unk if the vns device is presently activated.

Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Manufacturer (Section D)
houston TX *
Manufacturer Contact
darlene garner
100 cyberonics blvd.
ste. 600
houston , TX 77058
(281) 281 -2812
28122872 2812287200
MDR Report Key566648
Report Number1644487-2005-00070
Device Sequence Number1
Product CodeLYJ
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/21/2004
1 Device Was Involved in the Event
1 Patient Was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/20/2005
Is This An Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is This A Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device EXPIRATION Date01/31/2006
Device MODEL Number102
Device LOT Number10275
Was Device Available For Evaluation? No
Is The Reporter A Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/21/2004
Was Device Evaluated By Manufacturer? Device Not Returned To Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/01/2004
Is The Device Single Use? Yes
Is this a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial

Date Received: 01/20/2005 Patient Sequence Number: 1
02/28/2006, DATE OF MFG 02/26/2004, STERILIZATION
LOT NO. 10275.