• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

522 Postmarket Surveillance Studies Database

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
The FDA has the authority to require device manufacturers to perform postmarket surveillance under Section 522 of the Food, Drugs and Cosmetics (FD&C) Act, when questions are identified for devices that meet the statutory criteria. This database contains information about 522 Postmarket Surveillance Studies that have been required. This database allows you to search information about the postmarket surveillance requirements by manufacturer or device.

Learn more...

            
  To search for Manufacturer beginning with a specific letter, select that letter
 
 A 
 B 
 C 
 D 
 E 
 F 
 G 
 H 
 I 
 J 
 L 
 M 
 N 
 O 
 P 
 R 
 S 
 T 
 U 
 V 
 W 
 X 
 Z 
 
 
   

Explant Analysis


 
Suggest Enhancement / Report Issue | export reports to excelExport to Excel
General
Study Status Completed
522 Number / Requirement Number PS110038 / PSS002
Date Original Plan Accepted 07/06/2012
Date Current Plan Accepted 09/28/2012
Study Name Explant Analysis
Device Name Depuy pinnacle metal-on-metal acetabular cup liners
Root Document Number K073413  K080991  K070359  K003523  K082239  K040627  K093646  K083642  K002883  K023786  K062426  K090998  K073570  K070554  K042992  K061221  K082585 
General Study Protocol Parameters
Study Design Other Study Design
Data Source New Data Collection
Comparison Group No Control
Analysis Type Descriptive
Study Population Transit. Adolescent B (as adults) : 18-21 yrs, Adult: >21
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters
Study Objectives This is an explant analysis study. Explanted devices will be retrieved from Pinnacle and ASR patients participating in 522 investigations and from patients outside of the 522 study whose surgeons agreed to follow protocol defined steps for retrieval and analysis.
Study Population Explanted devices from patients who received the Pinnacle or ASR in the post-market environment.
Sample Size Consecutive available devices for retrieval will be enrolled.
Key Study Endpoints Modes and causes of implant failure
Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up Not applicable. This is an analysis of explanted devices.
Interim or Final Data Summary
Actual Number of Patients Enrolled ASR-XL: Stage 1 analysis – 1620 retrievals; Stage 2 analysis – 1266 retrievals
Pinnacle Ultamet: Stage 1 analysis – 327 retrievals
Actual Number of Sites Enrolled 8 sites initiated
Patient Followup Rate Not applicable.
Final Safety Findings The majority of failures occurred between 1 to 7 years. The main causes for ASR-XL revision surgery listed are: ALTR (46.0%), Pain (45.0%), Other (26.0%), Noise (3.6%), Dislocation (0.4%), Cup Loosening (11.3%). The main causes for Pinnacle Ultamet revision surgery listed are: ALTR (59.0%), Pain (60.0%), Other (8.3%), Noise (5.2%), Dislocation (6.1%), Cup Loosening (13.1%), Infection (5.8%), Osteolysis (15.3%), Malalignment (2.1%).

Forty-six percent (46.0%) of ASR-XL explants and fifty-nine percent (59.0%) of Pinnacle cups were linked to ALTRs. Median ALVAL scores of 6 were seen for explants with accompanying tissue samples (N = 191 ASR: N = 41 Pinnacle). Percentage of explants with moderate scratching were ASR – 78.0%, Pinnacle – 83.0%. The median bearing wear rate (mm3/year) for the Pinnacle was 1.97 mm3/year and bearing wear rates for the ASR was 5.07 mm3/year (Site 1) and 3.41 mm3/year (Site 2). Higher volumetric wear was correlated to higher blood metal ion levels (N = 237 ASR and N = 49 Pinnacle) . The percentage of edge-loaded cups were 90.0% (Stage 2) for ASR and 85.0% (Stage 2) for Pinnacle. No gender difference was associated with edge-loading. The percentages of tapers exhibiting Goldberg scores between 3–4 were 73.5% for ASR and 84.0% for Pinnacle, respectively. Goldberg scores tended to be higher for male patients than female patients.
Final Effectiveness Findings Not applicable, explant analysis study focused on safety.
Study Strengths and Weaknesses The number of explants is a major strength of this post-market surveillance study as the number of explants included in the study far exceeded the goal of 80 to 100 explants. A weakness of the study is insufficient cross-sectional connection to clinical/patient data and lack of complete volumetric analyses (taper wear unquantified), therefore not all endpoints for their explant protocol could be evaluated
Recommendations for Labeling Changes No labeling changes are recommended because the device is no longer marketed.


Explant Analysis Reporting Schedule

Reporting Schedule
Report
Date Due
FDA Receipt
Date
Applicant's Reporting Status
6 month report 04/29/2013 04/29/2013 On Time
1 year report 10/31/2013 11/06/2013 Overdue/Received
18 month report 03/31/2014 04/02/2014 Overdue/Received
2 yr report 04/30/2015 04/30/2015 On Time
3 yr report 04/30/2016 04/29/2016 On Time
final report 03/28/2017 03/28/2017 On Time


Contact Us


Mandated Studies Program
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Ave.
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Email: MandatedStudiesPrograms@fda.hhs.gov

Additional Resources


-
-