| Part B: Supplementary Information Sheet (SIS) |
|
FR Recognition List Number
|
047
|
Date of Entry 08/21/2017
|
|
FR Recognition Number
|
11-269
|
| Standard | |
ASTM F2423-11 (Reapproved 2020)
Standard Guide for Functional, Kinematic, and Wear Assessment of Total Disc Prostheses |
|
Scope/Abstract1.1 This guide provides guidance for wear and/or fatigue testing of total disc prostheses under functional and kinematic conditions and, to this end, describes test methods for assessment of the wear or functional characteristics, or both, of total disc prostheses.
1.2 Both lumbar and cervical prostheses are addressed.
1.3 Load and kinematic profiles for lumbar and cervical devices are not identical and, therefore, are addressed separately in the guide.
1.4 Partial disc replacements, such as nucleus replacements or facet joint replacements, are not intended to be addressed.
1.5 Wear is assessed using a weight loss method in a testing medium as defined in this guide.
1.6 This guide does not address any potential failure mode as it relates to the fixation of the implant to its bony interfaces.
1.7 It is the intent of this guide to enable comparison of intervertebral disc (IVD) prostheses with regard to wear and fatigue characteristics when tested under the specified conditions. It must be recognized, however, that there are many possible variations in in vivo conditions. A single laboratory simulation with a fixed set of parameters might not be universally representative.
1.8 Most IVD prostheses primarily fall into two classifications: articulating ball-in-socket type prostheses, and elastomeric or compliant type prostheses. For the former, this guide primarily addresses Mode 1 wear (defined herein); whereas for the latter, this guide addresses potential failure of the prosthesis when the implant is subjected to a range of motion and/or loads that fall within the full range of possible physiologic motions and loads.
1.9 For articulating components, this guide predominantly describes a Mode 1 test. The user is cautioned that other modes of wear may occur and may have significant influence on the functionality and performance of an articulating IVD prosthesis, and therefore the user should consider the effects of other wear modes on the performance of the prosthesis.
1.10 In order that the data be reproducible and comparable within and between laboratories, it is essential that uniform procedures are established. This guide is intended to facilitate uniform methods for testing and reporting of data for total disc replacement prostheses.
1.11 Without a substantial clinical retrieval history of IVD prostheses, actual loading profiles and patterns cannot be delineated at the time of the writing of this guide. It therefore follows that the load and motion conditions specified by this guide do not necessarily accurately reproduce those occurring in vivo. Rather, this guide provides useful boundary/endpoint conditions for evaluating prosthesis designs in a functional manner.
|
|
| Extent of Recognition
|
Rationale for Recognition
| This standard is relevant to medical devices and is recognized on its scientific and technical merit and/or because it supports existing regulatory policies. |
|
Public Law, CFR Citation(s) and Procode(s)*
| Regulation Number |
Device Name |
Device Class |
Product Code |
| N/A |
Prosthesis, Intervertebral Disc |
Class 3
|
MJO
|
|
Relevant FDA Guidance and/or Supportive Publications*
| Appropriate Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards in Premarket Submissions for Medical Devices - Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff, issued September 2018. |
|
| FDA Technical Contact
|
| Standards Development Organization
|
| FDA Specialty Task Group (STG)
|
| *These are provided as examples and others may be applicable. |
