• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Premarket Approval (PMA)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC | Inspections
 


New Search Back to Search Results
Note: this medical device record is a supplement. The device description may have changed. Be sure to look at the original PMA to get an up-to-date view of this device.
 
Trade NameCONTAK RENEWAL 3 CRT-D MODELS H170/H175, CONTAK RENEWAL 3 HE CRT-D MODELS H177/H179, AND MODEL 2845 VERSION 2.2 SOFTWARE
Classification Namedefibrillator, automatic implantable cardioverter, with cardiac resynchronization (crt-d)
Generic Namecardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) system
ApplicantGUIDANT CORP.
PMA NumberP010012
Supplement NumberS008
Date Received12/24/2002
Decision Date06/13/2003
Product Code
NIK[ Registered Establishments with NIK ]
Advisory Committee Cardiovascular
Supplement Typenormal 180 day track
Supplement Reason change design/components/specifications - component
Expedited Review Granted? No
Combination Product No
Recalls CDRH Recalls
Approval Order Statement 
Approval for the contak renewal 3 crt-d models h170/h175, contak renewal 3 he crt-d models h177/h179, and model 2845 version 2. 2 software. The contak renewal 3 system is indicated for patients who are at high risk of sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmias and who have moderate to severe heart failure (nyha class iii/iv) including left ventricular dysfunction (ef <= 35%) and qrs duration >= 120 ms and remain symptomatic despite stable, optimal heart failure drug therapy. Patient populations at high risk of sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmias include, but are not limited to, those with: 1) survival of at least one episode of cardiac arrest (manifested by the loss of consciousness) due to a ventricular tachyarrhythmia. 2) recurrent, poorly tolerated sustained ventricular tachycardia (vt). Note: the clinical outcome of hemodynamically stable, sustained-vt patients is not fully known. Safety and effectiveness studies have not been conducted. 3) prior myocardial infarction, left ventricular ejection fraction of <=35%, and a documented episode of nonsustained vt, with an inducible ventricular tachy-arrhythmia. Patients suppressible with iv procainamide or an equivalent antiarrhythmic (drug) have not been studied.
-
-