f Post-Approval Studies (PAS) Database
  • Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Post-Approval Studies (PAS) Database

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-

The FDA has the authority to require sponsors to perform a post-approval study (or studies) at the time of approval of a premarket approval (PMA), humanitarian device exemption (HDE), or product development protocol (PDP) application. Post-approval studies can provide patients, health care professionals, the device industry, the FDA and other stakeholders information on the continued safety and effectiveness (or continued probable benefit, in the case of an HDE) of approved medical devices. This database allows you to search Post-Approval Study information by applicant or device information.

Learn more...


           

Training Program


Suggest Enhancement / Report Issue | export reports to excelExport to Excel
General
Study Status Completed
Application Number /
Requirement Number
P120006 / PAS002
Date Original Protocol Accepted 10/05/2012
Date Current Protocol Accepted 08/28/2013
Study Name Training Program
Device Name OVATION ABDOMINAL STENT GRAFT SYSTEM
General Study Protocol Parameters
Study Design Prospective Cohort Study
Data Source New Data Collection
Comparison Group Concurrent Control
Analysis Type Descriptive
Study Population Adult: >21
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters
Study Objectives A prospective, consecutively enrolling, single-arm, non-randomized, multi- center study
Study Population Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm with vascular morphology suitable for endovascular repair with the Ovation/Ovation Prime Abdominal Stent Graft System. Eligible patients must have met or must meet all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria.

Patients will be categorized into those treated by physicians

¿ who completed fewer than 20 endovascular repairs of AAA with any endovascular graft in the 2 years preceding participation in the Ovation physician training program, and those
¿ who completed 20 or more cases in the preceding 2 years.
Sample Size A total 320 subjects comprises of 161 pivotal cohort subjects, all continued access subjects, all subjects from the HDE PAS and at least 59 de novo subjects enrolled from a minimum of 15 U.S. sites.
Key Study Endpoints At Implant
Technical failure
Type 1 endoleak
Use of Accessory device

Through 30 days
Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Mortality (AAA-related and all-cause)
Device Patency
Conversion to open surgical repair
Endoleak
AAA enlargement
Stent Graft Migration
Device integrity
Secondary endovascular procedures
Aneurysm rupture
Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up 30 days
At implant and 30 days
Interim or Final Data Summary
Actual Number of Patients Enrolled 320
Actual Number of Sites Enrolled 49
Patient Follow-up Rate 100% at 30 days
Final Safety Findings N/A
Final Effect Findings At Implant
Endpoint results for physicians with fewer than 20 prior endovascular repairs and physicians with 20 or more prior endovascular repair in 2 years preceding participation in Ovation/Ovation Prime Training Program were as follows: Technical failure 0% for both physician groups, Type 1 endoleak 0% vs. 0.7% (95% CI for difference 0.7%: -2.9%, 4.2%), and Use of Accessory devices 5.0% vs.8.7% (95% CI for difference 3.7%: -8.9%, 16.3%), respectively.

Through 30 days post Implant
The adverse events rates for physician with fewer than 20 endovascular repairs and physicians with 20 or more endovascular repair in 2 years preceding participation in Ovation/Ovation Prime Training Program were as follows: AAA-related secondary endovascular procedures 0% vs. 1.0%, device-related SAEs 0% vs.
1.3%, and renal events (including acute kidney injury, renal insufficiency, renal failure) 0% vs. 1.7%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups for any adverse event. The rates for thromboembolic events, paralysis/paraparesis, stroke, claudication and ischemic colitis were 0% in both physician groups.
Study Strengths & Weaknesses The study achieved the target enrollment of 320 patients with 100% follow-up at 30days and a high technical success. Patient enrollment in the physicians with fewer than 20 prior endovascular experience group was low.
Recommendations for Labeling Changes Labeling change NOT Recommended


Training Program Reporting Schedule

Reporting Schedule
Report
Date Due
FDA Receipt
Date
Applicant's Reporting Status
six month report 04/05/2013 04/10/2013 Overdue/Received
one year report 10/05/2013 09/19/2013 On Time
18 month report 04/05/2014 04/02/2014 On Time
two year report 10/05/2014 09/23/2014 On Time
three year report 10/05/2015 09/21/2015 On Time
final Report 03/02/2016 03/02/2016 On Time
revision to final report 10/05/2016 10/05/2016 On Time


Contact Us

Mandated Studies Program
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Ave.
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Email: MandatedStudiesPrograms@fda.hhs.gov

Additional Resources

-
-