f Post-Approval Studies (PAS) Database
  • Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Post-Approval Studies (PAS) Database

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-

The FDA has the authority to require sponsors to perform a post-approval study (or studies) at the time of approval of a premarket approval (PMA), humanitarian device exemption (HDE), or product development protocol (PDP) application. Post-approval studies can provide patients, health care professionals, the device industry, the FDA and other stakeholders information on the continued safety and effectiveness (or continued probable benefit, in the case of an HDE) of approved medical devices. This database allows you to search Post-Approval Study information by applicant or device information.

Learn more...


           

Amulet Real-World Use Surveillance


Suggest Enhancement / Report Issue | export reports to excelExport to Excel
General
Study Status Ongoing
Application Number /
Requirement Number
P200049 / PAS002
Date Original Protocol Accepted 12/09/2021
Date Current Protocol Accepted  
Study Name Amulet Real-World Use Surveillance
Device Name Amplatzer™ Amulet™ Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
General Study Protocol Parameters
Study Design Prospective Cohort Study
Data Source External Registry
Comparison Group Objective Performance Criterion
Analysis Type Analytical
Study Population Adult: >21
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters
Study Objectives Comprehensive/Linked/Registry Based Surveillance
Study Population Patients with attempted implant of the Amulet device enrolled at sites participating in the LAAO registry.
Sample Size All consecutive patients treated within the first 2 years that are entered into the LAAO Registry.

Key Study Endpoints Primary endpoints include the following:
1. Primary safety: composite of procedure-related complications, or all-cause death, or major bleeding (defined as Type 3 or greater based on the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definition) through 12 months
2. Primary effectiveness: composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism through 18 months
3. Device closure: device closure rate at the 45-day visit
4. Pericardial effusion: rate of pericardial effusion events requiring intervention through 2 years
Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up The applicant has agreed to link the data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) claims database for long-term surveillance of these patients through 5 years post implantation (follow-up duration).
Interim or Final Data Summary
Interim Results Key Safety Findings:
. Adverse Events (AEs)
AE counts as reported by the LAAO registry in-hospital (defined as any AE at the
index procedure through when the patient was discharged from the hospital): 146
patients (6.0%) had an in-hospital AE. The most frequently reported AEs by
preferred term included pericardial effusion with no intervention (1.1%), pericardial
effusion with tamponade (requiring percutaneous drainage) (0.7%), and respiratory
failure (0.4%). The rate of early pericardial effusion (in-hospital) that required
intervention was 1.0%.
AE counts reported at 45 days : 283 patients (16.5%) that have crossed the 45-day
visit had an AE. The most frequently reported AEs by preferred term included
nondevice-related readmission (9.2%), GI bleeding (2.3%), and pericardial effusion
w/ tamponade (requiring percutaneous drainage) (0.8%). The rate of late pericardial
effusion (45-day visit) that required intervention was 1.1%.
AE counts reported at 6 months : 61 patients (25.9%) that have crossed the 6-month
visit had an AE. The most frequently reported AEs by preferred term included
nondevice-related readmission (18.2%), GI bleeding (3.8%), and pulmonary
embolism (1.3%). Device thrombus occurred in only 1 patient (0.04%).
. Deaths
A total of 38 deaths were reported as of the cut-off date. Most deaths occurred
during follow-up (31 of the 38 deaths). The primary causes of death as reported by
the sites in the LAAO registry through the cut-off date were other cardiovascular
reasons (4), pulmonary (2), cardiovascular hemorrhage (1), and not specified (31).
Key Effectiveness Findings:
The rate of implant success was 96.8% with 99.96% of patients with =5mm residual
leak around the device post-procedure. At follow-up, 99.7% of patients had =5mm
residual leak at 45 days.
Actual Number of Patients Enrolled From August 14, 2021, through June 30, 2022, 2,414 patients were enrolled into this
Amulet Real-World Use Surveillance PAS study.
Actual Number of Sites Enrolled 151 sites have enrolled subjects as of the cut-off date
Patient Follow-up Rate Of the 2414 patients with an Amulet attempted procedure:
o 2407 (99.7%) patients were documented as completing the hospitalization visit
(episode of care)
o 1714 (71.9%) patients completed their 45-day visit
o 236 (9.9%) completed the 6-month visit although most have not crossed the
outside 6-month visit window as of the cut-off date.
Study Strengths & Weaknesses The results from this study provide the long-term safety and effectiveness of the
Amulet occluder in a contemporary real-world setting.


Amulet Real-World Use Surveillance Reporting Schedule

Reporting Schedule
Report
Date Due
FDA Receipt
Date
Applicant's Reporting Status
6 month report 02/12/2022 02/11/2022 On Time
1 year report 08/14/2022 08/12/2022 On Time
18 month report 02/12/2023 02/07/2023 On Time
2 year report 08/14/2023 08/10/2023 On Time
3 year report 08/13/2024    
4 year report 08/13/2025    


Contact Us

Mandated Studies Program
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Ave.
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Email: MandatedStudiesPrograms@fda.hhs.gov

Additional Resources

-
-