f Post-Approval Studies (PAS) Database
  • Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Post-Approval Studies (PAS) Database

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-

The FDA has the authority to require sponsors to perform a post-approval study (or studies) at the time of approval of a premarket approval (PMA), humanitarian device exemption (HDE), or product development protocol (PDP) application. Post-approval studies can provide patients, health care professionals, the device industry, the FDA and other stakeholders information on the continued safety and effectiveness (or continued probable benefit, in the case of an HDE) of approved medical devices. This database allows you to search Post-Approval Study information by applicant or device information.

Learn more...


           

TMR


Suggest Enhancement / Report Issue | export reports to excelExport to Excel
General
Study Status Completed
Application Number /
Requirement Number
P970029 / PAS001
Date Original Protocol Accepted 10/20/2009
Date Current Protocol Accepted 10/20/2009
Study Name TMR
Device Name TMR HOLMIUM LASER SYSTEM
General Study Protocol Parameters
Study Design Prospective Cohort Study
Data Source New Data Collection
Comparison Group Historical Control
Analysis Type Analytical
Study Population Transit. Adolescent B (as adults) : 18-21 yrs, Adult: >21
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters
Study Objectives The study was initially designed as a randomized study comparing 300 eligible patients receiving TMR immediately to 300 patients receiving TMR following a 30-day delay period. Enrollment in this study as originally designed was not successful. The postmarket study was redesigned as a nonrandomized registry with a sample size of 500. Eligible patients can be enrolled prospectively and retrospectively.
Study Population Study Population: Patients who may benefit from maintenance of AV synchrony. Indication: Transmyocardial revascularization with the Eclipse TMR System is indicated for treatment of adult patients with ejection fractions of 25% or more and with stable angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class 4). These patients also have a region of the myocardium with reversible ischemia, however are not candidates for bypass surgery or angioplasty.
Sample Size 500 patients, 25 sites
Key Study Endpoints The primary endpoint of this study is all-cause 30-day mortality. An additional analysis to be reported in this study is the 30-day risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as the incidence of cardiac-related death, myocardial infarction Q-wave and non Q-wave), congestive heart failure/ cerebrovascular accident, and serious arrhythmia.
Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up The patients will be followed in the hospital and 30 calendar days following the TMR procedure or to discharge, whichever is later.
Interim or Final Data Summary
Interim Results The 30-day all-cause mortality risk in the PAS is 2.8% (8/358) [2.8% (2/72) prospectively enrolled and 2.1% (6/286) retrospectively enrolled). Six deaths were cardiac related and 4 deaths were not. Of the 26 patients removed from the study, 2 died within 30 days one death was cardiac related. Baseline demographic variables and clinical risk factors were included in an analysis to determine predictors of 30-day all-cause mortality. A multivariable logistic analysis showed there were no variables significant at the p = 0.05 level. There were 43 major adverse cardiac events that occurred in 33 patients for an overall major adverse cardiac event rate of 9.2% (33/358). Of the 33 patients with at least one major adverse cardiac event, 7 (9.7%) patients were enrolled prospectively and 26 (9.1%) patients were enrolled retrospectively. Serious arrhythmia accounted for the majority of major advers cardiac events (6.7%). Among the 25 episodes of arrhythmia in 24 patients. 14 events occurred within 48-hours of the TMR procedure; 4 events occurred within 72-hours; and the remaining 7 events occurred between day 4 and day 29 days post TMR procedure. Of the 26 patients who were removed from the study as of this report, two experienced a major adverse cardiac event (arrhythmia). The results of the analyses shown in Table 8 indicate that only the number of TMR channels is a statistically significant independent predictor of 30- day major adverse cardiac event. The number of channel counts was also further analyzed, grouped by increments of 10, to determine if a trend existed toward increased major adverse cardiac event with increased numbers of TMR Channels.
Actual Number of Patients Enrolled 358
Actual Number of Sites Enrolled 20
Patient Follow-up Rate 100%
Final Safety Findings In the Post-Approval Study of 358 patients treated with the Sologrip or Pearl 5.0 Handpieces, patients with ejection fractions ¡Â30% were at higher risk of death at 30-days (11.1%) compared to patients with ejection fractions >30% (1.5%). The number of TMR channels is a statistically significant independent predictor of 30- day MACE. The 30-day mortality proportion in the PAS (2.8%) is lower than the pre-approval study (5.3%).
Final Effect Findings The post-approval study was not designed to examine effectiveness.
Study Strengths & Weaknesses Strength: The study included 358 patients providing a fair characterization of the 30-day mortality and MACE proportions.
Weakness: The post-approval study included a large proportion of retrospectively (n=286) (i.e., since the time of the original FDA approval [March 1999]) enrolled participants compared to the prospectively (n=72) enrolled.
Recommendations for Labeling Changes In the Post-Approval Study of 358 patients treated with the Sologrip or Pearl 5.0
Handpieces, patients with ejection fractions ¡Â30% were at higher risk of death (11.1%)
compared to patients with ejection fractions >30% (1.5%).

A typical application of the device creates the lowest number of TMR channels yielding a density of 1 TMR channel/cm©÷ in ischemic myocardium. The benefits of creating larger numbers of channels (> 40), either to treat broader areas of ischemia or to achieve a higher channel density, should be weighed against the potential risks of adverse events for each patient.


TMR Reporting Schedule

Reporting Schedule
Report
Date Due
FDA Receipt
Date
Applicant's Reporting Status
PAS annual Report 06/27/2008 06/27/2008 On Time
10 year report 06/30/2009 07/01/2009 Overdue/Received
10 year bi annual report 10/30/2009 10/30/2009 On Time
11 year report 04/30/2010 05/04/2010 Overdue/Received
Final Report 10/30/2010 10/01/2010 On Time
response to R21 RDEF (final report) 04/17/2011 04/15/2011 On Time


Contact Us

Mandated Studies Program
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Ave.
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Email: MandatedStudiesPrograms@fda.hhs.gov

Additional Resources

-
-