Approved Drug Label (PDF)
5
Warnings and Precautions
5.3 Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (SCARs)
Newly added
subsection:
SCARs,
including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN),
drug reaction with eosinophilia and
systemic symptoms (DRESS), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), which can be life-threatening or
fatal, have been reported in association with gemcitabine treatment [see Adverse Reactions (6.2)]. Monitor
patients for signs and symptoms of severe cutaneous adverse reactions.
Permanently discontinue gemcitabine in patients who develop SCARs.
6
Adverse Reactions
Addition of the
following to the bulleted line listing:
6.2 Postmarketing
Experience
Additions and/or
revisions underlined:
…
Skin: Cellulitis, pseudocellulitis,
severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), including Stevens-Johnson
syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with
eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and acute generalized exanthematous
pustulosis (AGEP); desquamation and bullous skin eruptions
…
17 PCI/PI/MG (Patient Counseling Information/Patient Information/Medication Guide)
PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION
Additions and/or
revisions underlined:
…
Severe Cutaneous
Adverse Reactions (SCARs)
Advise
patients of the risks of SCARs, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic
epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic
symptoms (DRESS), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Instruct
patients to immediately contact their healthcare provider should any signs or
symptoms of severe skin rash or skin peeling, blistering and/or mouth sores occur [see Warnings
and Precautions (5.3)].
…
Approved Drug Label (PDF)
5
Warnings and Precautions
5.2 Myelosuppression
Additions and/or revisions underlined:
… In
clinical
trials, Grade 3-4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 25%,
8%, and 5%, respectively of the 979 patients who received single
agent gemcitabine …
5.3 Pulmonary Toxicity and Respiratory Failure
Additions and/or revisions underlined:
… Permanently discontinue
INFUGEM in patients who develop unexplained dyspnea, with or without
bronchospasm, or evidence of severe pulmonary toxicity.
5.4 Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
Additions and/or revisions underlined:
Hemolytic uremic syndrome
(HUS), including fatalities from renal failure or the requirement for dialysis,
can occur with INFUGEM. In clinical trials, HUS occurred in 0.25%
of 2429 patients. Most fatal cases of renal failure were due to HUS [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. Serious
cases of thrombotic microangiopathy other than HUS have been reported with
gemcitabine [see Adverse Reactions (6.2)].
Assess renal function prior
to initiation of INFUGEM and periodically during treatment. Consider the
diagnosis of HUS in patients who develop anemia with evidence of
microangiopathic hemolysis; increased bilirubin or LDH; reticulocytosis;
severe thrombocytopenia; or renal failure (increased serum creatinine or
BUN …
5.5 Hepatic Toxicity
Additions and/or revisions underlined:
Assess hepatic function
prior to initiation of INFUGEM and periodically during treatment. Permanently
discontinue INFUGEM in patients who develop severe hepatic toxicity.
5.6 Embryo-Fetal Toxicity
Additions and/or revisions underlined:
Based on animal data and its mechanism of action, INFUGEM can cause fetal harm
when administered to a pregnant woman.
Advise male patients with
female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during
treatment with INFUGEM and for 3 months following the final dose [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1,
8.3)].
6
Adverse Reactions
6.1 Clinical Trials Experience
Additions and/or revisions underlined:
… Tables 7 and 8 present the
incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities
reported in patients with various malignancies receiving single agent
gemcitabine across 5 clinical trials. Additional clinically significant
adverse reactions are provided following Table 8.
Ovarian Cancer
… for the second-line
treatment of ovarian cancer in women with disease that had relapsed more than 6
months following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy [see Clinical Studies (14.1)]. Additional clinically significant
adverse reactions, occurring in <10% of patients, are provided following
Table 10.
The proportion of
patients with dose adjustments for carboplatin (1.8% versus 3.8%), doses of
carboplatin omitted (0.2% versus 0) and discontinuing treatment for adverse
reactions (11% versus 10%), were similar between arms. Dose adjustment for
gemcitabine occurred in 10% of patients and gemcitabine dose was omitted in 14%
of patients in the gemcitabine/carboplatin arm. Table 9: Adverse Reactions
Occurring in >10% of Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Carboplatin and at
Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Carboplatin [Between
Arm Difference of greater than or equal to 5% (All Grades) or greater than or
equal to 2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 1a
Table 10: Laboratory
Abnormalities Occurring in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Carboplatin and
at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Carboplatin
[Between Arm Difference of greater than or equal to 5% (All Grades) or greater
than or equal to 2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 1a
Hematopoietic growth
factors were administered more frequently in the gemcitabine-containing arm:
leukocyte growth factor (24% and 10%) and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (7%
and 3.9%).
The following clinically
relevant Grade 3 and 4 adverse
reactions occurred more frequently in the gemcitabine with carboplatin arm:
dyspnea (3.4% versus 2.9%), febrile neutropenia (1.1% versus 0), hemorrhagic
event (2.3% versus 1.1 %), motor neuropathy (1.1% versus 0.6%), and
rash/desquamation (0.6% versus 0).
Breast Cancer
Tables 11 and 12 present
the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities,
occurring in greater than or equal to 10% of gemcitabine-treated patients and
at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine with paclitaxel arm, reported in a
randomized trial (Study 2) of gemcitabine with paclitaxel (n=262) compared to
paclitaxel alone (n=259) for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast
cancer (MBC) in women who received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy in the
adjuvant/neo-adjuvant setting or for whom anthracyclines were contraindicated [see Clinical Studies
(14.2)]. Additional clinically
significant adverse reactions, occurring in <10% of patients, are provided
following Table 12.
The requirement for dose
reduction of paclitaxel was higher for patients in the gemcitabine/paclitaxel
arm (5% versus 2%). The number of paclitaxel doses omitted (<1%), the
proportion of patients discontinuing treatment for adverse reactions (7% versus
5%) and the number of treatment-related deaths (1 patient in each arm) were
similar between the two arms.
Table 11: Selected
Adverse Reactions Occurring in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Paclitaxel
and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Paclitaxel
[Between Arm Difference of greater than or equal to 5% (All Grades) or greater
than or equal to 2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 2a
Table 12: Selected
Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in >10% of Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Paclitaxel
and at a Higher Incidence than Patients Receiving Single Agent Paclitaxel
[Between Arm Difference of greater than or equal to 5% (All Grades) or greater
than or equal to 2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 2a
Non-Small Cell Lung
Cancer
Tables 13 and 14 present
the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities
occurring in greater than or equal to
10% of gemcitabine-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the
gemcitabine with cisplatin arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 3) of
gemcitabine with cisplatin (n=260) administered in 28-day cycles as
compared to cisplatin alone (n=262) in patients receiving first-line
treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.
Tables 15 and 16
present the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory
abnormalities occurring in greater than or equal to 10% of gemcitabine-treated
patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm,
reported in a randomized trial (Study 4) of gemcitabine with cisplatin (n=69)
administered in 21-day cycles as compared to etoposide with cisplatin (n=66) in
patients receiving first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic
NSCLC [see Clinical Studies (14.3)]. Additional
clinically significant adverse reactions are provided following Table
16.
Table 15: Selected
Adverse Reactions in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Cisplatin in Study 4a
Table 16: Selected
Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with
Cisplatin in Study 4a
6.2 Postmarketing Experience
Newly added information:
Blood and Lymphatic System: Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA)
Pulmonary: Addition of ‘pulmonary eosinophilia’
8
Use in Specific Populations
8.3 Females and Males of Reproductive Potential
Additions and/or revisions underlined:
… Contraception
Females
Because of the potential
for genotoxicity, advise females of
reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with
INFUGEM and for 6 months after the final dose [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)].
Males
Because of the potential
for genotoxicity, advise males with
female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during
treatment with INFUGEM and for 3 months after the final
dose [see Nonclinical Toxicology (13.1)].
Infertility
Males
Based on animal studies,
INFUGEM may impair fertility in males of reproductive potential [see Nonclinical Toxicology (13.1)]. It
is not known whether these effects on fertility are reversible.
8.5 Geriatric Use
Additions and/or revisions underlined:
… In a randomized trial in
women with ovarian cancer (Study 1), 175 women received gemcitabine with
carboplatin, of which 29% were age 65 years or older.
Gemcitabine clearance is
affected by age; however, there are no recommended dose adjustments based on
patients’ age [see Clinical Pharmacology
(12.3)].