U.S. flag An official website of the United States government
  1. Home
  2. Drug Databases
  3. Drug Safety-related Labeling Changes

Drug Safety-related Labeling Changes (SrLC)

Get Email Alerts | Guide

RECARBRIO (NDA-212819)

(CILASTATIN SODIUM; IMIPENEM; RELEBACTAM)

Safety-related Labeling Changes Approved by FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)

Download Data

Expand all

12/09/2025 (SUPPL-8)

Approved Drug Label (PDF)

6 Adverse Reactions

6.1 Clinical Trials Experience

Additions and/or revisions underlined:

Pediatric Patients

Clinical Trial Experience in Pediatric Patients with HABP/VABP, cUTI and cIAI

RECARBRIO was evaluated in an open-label, randomized, active-controlled, multi-dose, phase 2/3 clinical trial (Trial 4) in pediatric patients from birth to less than 18 years of age with HABP/VABP, cUTI or cIAI [see Clinical Studies (14.3)]. A total of 85 patients were treated with RECARBRIO and 28 were treated with a comparator agent (investigator's choice from a specified list of comparators). RECARBRIO was administered intravenously as a weight-based dose of 37.5 mg/kg (imipenem 15 mg/kg, cilastatin 15 mg/kg, and relebactam 7.5 mg/kg) every 6 hours or 8 hours, or a fixed-dose of 1.25 grams (imipenem 500 mg, cilastatin 500 mg, and relebactam 250 mg) every 6 hours. In Trial 4, adverse reactions were comparable to those observed in adults. No patient died in either intervention group in the study through Day 28. The most common adverse reactions occurring in greater than 3% of pediatric patients receiving RECARBRIO were vomiting (15%), diarrhea (9%), nausea (7%), headache (6%), phlebitis/infusion site reactions (including phlebitis, infusion site phlebitis, infusion site extravasation, medical device site dermatitis; 5%), and rash (including rash, rash erythematous, rash maculopapular; 4%).

8 Use in Specific Populations

8.4 Pediatric Use

Additions and/or revisions underlined:

The safety and effectiveness of RECARBRIO for the treatment of HABP/VABP, and for the treatment of cUTI and cIAI in patients who have limited or no alternative treatment options have been established in pediatric patients weighing at least 2 kg. Use of RECARBRIO in pediatric patients is supported by evidence from an adequate and well-controlled trial of RECARBRIO in adults with HABP/VABP, controlled trials in adults with cUTI and cIAI, and additional pharmacokinetic, safety, and efficacy data from pediatric trials [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) and Clinical Studies (14.1, 14.2 and 14.3)].

The safety profile of RECARBRIO in pediatric patients from the pediatric trials was comparable to that in adults treated with RECARBRIO [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)].

RECARBRIO is not recommended in pediatric patients less than 37 weeks post-menstrual age (gestational age at birth plus post-natal age) or weighing less than 30 kg with renal impairment.

The safety and effectiveness of RECARBRIO for the treatment of HABP/VABP, cUTI or cIAI have not been established in pediatric patients weighing less than 2 kg.

8.6 Renal Impairment

Additions and/or revisions underlined:

Reduce RECARBRIO dosage in adult patients with a CLcr less than 90 mL/min and in pediatric patients weighing at least 30 kg with an eGFR less than 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 [see Dosage and Administration (2.3, 2.4) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. RECARBRIO is not recommended in pediatric patients weighing less than 30 kg with renal impairment.

06/04/2020 (SUPPL-2)

Approved Drug Label (PDF)

6 Adverse Reactions

6.1 Clinical Trials Experience

(Additions, please refer to label for complete information)

8 Use in Specific Populations

8.5 Geriatric Use

(Additions and revisions underlined)

Of the 266 patients treated with RECARBRIO in Trial 1, 113 (42.5 %) were 65 years of age or older, including 55 (20.7 %) patients 75 years of age and older. Of the 216 patients treated with imipenem/cilastatin plus relebactam 250 mg in Trials 2 and 3, 67 (31.0 %) were 65 years of age or older, including 25 (11.6 %) patients 75 years of age and older. No overall differences in safety or effectiveness were observed between these patients and younger patients, and other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in responses between the elderly and younger patients, but greater sensitivity of some older individuals cannot be ruled out.