• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA III GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA III GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number GIF-HQ190
Medical Device Problem Code Microbial Contamination of Device (2303)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Bacterial Infection (1735); Nausea (1970); Pain (1994)
Date of Event 06/13/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report has been submitted by the importer under this mdr report number (b)(4).The device was not returned.Should additional relevant information become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.The complaint is related to the following linked patient identifiers: (b)(6).The scope was cultures (results negative) and sent to olympus for full inspection and service.The gastroscope was fully disassembled and all durable components inspected to olympus standards.All non-durable items (gaskets, seals, toric joint/packing joint were exchanged and the insertion tube angulation wires, bending section, air/water connector, and biopsy channel were replaced as part of the standard refurbishment process.Reprocessing: the cleaning and disinfectant solutions used with the endoscope was endoquick (olympus) and acecide (olympus) oer elite model.The minimum effective concentration was checked every time a cycle ran in the reprocessor.The automated endoscope reprocessor (aer) being used to process the endoscope were oer elite by olympus.Serial numbers: (b)(6).The endoscope channel was brushed during manual cleaning.The brush was a single use brush with the model number bw-412-t.A precleaning was being used immediately after a procedure.The endoscope being leak tested prior to manual cleaning with leak tested with veriscan lt.The last preventive maintenance for aer was nov2023.The date of the last reprocessing in-service conducted by an olympus endoscopy support specialist (ess) on 30oct2023.There has been no changes in the facilities reprocessing personnel since the last on-site visit by an olympus ess.All reprocessing personnel trained on how to properly reprocess an endoscope.The endoscope being stored are by forced air drying cabinets.The scope did not have a previous positive culture.The scope was sent out at the request of "ip".It was sent out on 03aug2023 and again on 26oct2023.The patients b and c had two procedures during the timeframe.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that there was a possible patient infection spread through gastrointestinal videoscopescope.Hospital performed an investigation following identification of klebsiella pneumonia positive for new delhi metallo--lactamase-1 carbapenemase (ndm) carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (cre) from four patients (identified as patients a, b, c, d).Investigation revealed that all four patients had procedures performed within a 37-day period with the same gastroscope.The endoscope was removed from service on (b)(6) 2023 following the matching culture results from patients b and c and the investigation showing patient a had a positive culture with the same organism prior to her procedure.No lapses in endoscope cleaning were identified and there was no report of technical issues with the endoscope.Whole genome sequencing resulted in (b)(6) 2023, showed likely transmission between three patients.This raised suspicion that the scope could be the source, but other epidemiologic links were present.This patient does not share the other epidemiologic links as the other three patient.It has been confirmed that 3 patients have contracted an infection (klebsiella pneumonia, ndm+) following their endoscopic procedure.One of the patients is considered the index patient and had a known history of infection with the same organism (detected (b)(6) 2023) prior to having their endoscopic procedure.The scope has been permanently removed from service.This complaint captures patient d: the date of the procedure was on (b)(6) 2023.The procedure was an upper endoscopy.The date of the patient symptoms were on (b)(6) 2023.The patient symptoms were flank pain, pain, night sweats and nausea.The treatment used was ceftriaxone, ceftazidime-avibactam meropenem and colistin.The infection verification was a culture/pcr-polymerase chain reaction.The positive culture was received on (b)(6) 2023.The organism identified was klebsiella pneumoniae, ndm+.The specimen source was in the urine and blood.The patient had no significant past medical history, admitted with sepsis due to pyelonephritis.The patient is a 64 year old white male with a bmi or 26.9.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.Additionally, to provide correction to the initial with information inadvertently left out b3 and to provide additional information.Additional information received: (b)(6) 2024 olympus endoscopy support specialist (ess) followed up with the facility and confirmed that reprocessing steps by the user had no deviation for the instructions for use, post the last in-service correction that was performed on (b)(6) 2023.Although it was recommended to send in the subject device for cultures, the user did not agree to culture test and the subject device was not returned for inspection.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Based on the results of the investigation, olympus was not able to judge relation between the subject device and the event from the following investigation results.Additionally, it is likely the reported event occurred because reprocessing was insufficient due to deviation from the instruction for use.However, the root cause of the reported event could not be determined.The event can be prevented by following the instructions for use which state: "an insufficiently reprocessed endoscope and/or accessory may pose an infection control risk to the patients and/or operators who touch them." olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIS EXERA III GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE
Common Device Name
GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer (Section G)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key18789397
Report Number9610595-2024-04072
Device Sequence Number7599725
Product Code FDS
UDI-Device Identifier04953170305276
UDI-Public04953170305276
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K131780
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/30/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberGIF-HQ190
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/30/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/28/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/27/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/30/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/18/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient Age64 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient RaceWhite
-
-