An endoscopic support specialist provided a reprocessing in-service at the user facility, which included all cleaning, leak testing, high level disinfection, delayed reprocessing and storage using information contained in the olympus reprocessing manual.The evaluation of the event is ongoing.Should additional relevant information become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.This report has been submitted by the importer under this mdr report number 2429304-2024-0000418.This event was submitted by the user facility under this mdr number 1184621211-2024-0001.This report is related to the following linked patient identifiers: (b)(6).
|
It was reported that there were four (4) potential patients directly impacted by one suspected medical device.The patients underwent procedures involving the same individual suspected medical device between (b)(6) 2024.The patient referenced in this report was admitted to the hospital on (b)(6) 2024 for cholecystitis and septic shock.The patient's blood cultures were positive for pan sensitive e.Coli on admission.The patient underwent an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure with suspected medical device to remove stones on (b)(6) 2024.The patient's gallbladder drain was cultured on (b)(6), 2024 and was positive for carbapenem resistant e.Coli (cp-cre).The cp-cre was not treated since the patient was improving on current regimen.The patient was discharged on home health on (b)(6) 2024.On (b)(6) 2024, ercp procedure involving suspected medical device was identified as possible link between multiple cp-cre infections.On august 21, 2024, suspected medical device was examined by borescope during facility investigation.Borescope revealed a small tear within the inner sheath of the device.It is unknown when the tear appeared on the scope, what caused it, and whether it was present for ercp procedures involving affected patients.The customer reiterated that the device had an inner sheath tear, which the customer was not aware of, and they used the scope on several patients.The customer further stated that the device might have caused a cross contamination between patients.Reportedly, the device has been in quarantine in a secure location.The customer confirmed that the device passed the leak test prior to procedures being done.
|