• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LASIK

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LASIK Back to Search Results
Event Date 04/08/2008
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description

In 2008, i had lasik vision correction in both eyes for nearsightedness. Neither eye was properly corrected from 20/400 to 20/100. The left eye was corrected from 20/400 to 20/60. In 2008, i had the right eye corrected a second time, and it is now 20/40. In 2009, i had the left eye corrected a second time and it is now 20/15. Prior to, and during the whole procedure, i explained to the doctors that i was using flonase for allergies. They kept telling me to quit using eye drops for dry eye, as my eyes would not return to normal unless i did. During my last visit they finally listened, and advised that flonase was causing the dry eye, and that i should start using eye drops on a regular basis to counteract the problem. I have lost most of my near vision as a result of this procedure. If the doctor had listened to me at the outset, and not advised me to quit using eye drops, i believe i would not had had the 4th procedure, and would still have my near vision. Please, use this info to inform others. Dates of use: 2008 - 2009. Diagnosis: nearsighted.

 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of DeviceLASIK
MDR Report Key1501186
Report NumberMW5012925
Device Sequence Number1
Product CodeLZS
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation PATIENT
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/01/2009
1 Device Was Involved in the Event
0 PatientS WERE Involved in the Event:
Date FDA Received10/01/2009
Is This An Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is This A Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator OTHER
Was Device Available For Evaluation? No
Is The Reporter A Health Professional? No

-
-