This patient was implanted with the argus ii device on (b)(6) 2012.This patient is participating in a (b)(4) study of the argus ii.On (b)(6) 2013, the patient was diagnosed with conjunctival erosion caused by the mersilene suture on the coil suture tab perforating the conjunctiva.At that time, the surgeon decided to monitor the situation rather than to intervene.On (b)(6) 2013, the surgeon decided to operate on the patient to revise the sutures.On (b)(4) 2013, the subject underwent a procedure to replace the suture and re-suture the conjunctiva closed.The event was considered resolved on (b)(6) 2013.There was no defect or malfunction of the device associated with this event.
|