|
Model Number 20300101 |
Device Problems
Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Failure of Device to Self-Test (2937)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 10/17/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
As reported on (b)(6) 2014, a patient of unknown age and gender presented for a lecd thermal ablation of the pancreas.The patient was placed under anesthesia while the unit was prepped for the procedure.At the start up of the unit, the unit failed the self-test.As there was a delay in the procedure, the patient was under anesthesia for an extended time.A second nanoknife unit, available at the medical facility, was utilized to successfully complete the procedure.There was no harm or injury to the patient due to the event.It was reported the nanoknife system is available for return for evaluation to the manufacturer.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported that the nanoknife unit (sn (b)(4)) involved in the incident is available to be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.To date the generator has yet ot be returned.Attempts are being made to obtain the device.An investigation into the root cause for event is currently in progress.A review of the device history records was performed for the serial number (b)(4).The review confirms that the unit met all material, assembly, and performance specifications.The results of the unit evaluation will be sent via a follow up medwatch.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Nanoknife unit (sn (b)(4)) was returned for evaluation and repair.During assessment of the returned generator, the unit failed the self-test.Further investigation found that the switching board was defective and that the stop button was inoperable.The reported complaint description was confirmed as the unit did not function as intended.The root cause for the complaint description was determined to be a defective switching board.The switching board was replaced and the stop button was refitted to operate as intended.The generator was tested per operational verification procedure and met all acceptance criteria.A review of the device history records was performed for the serial number (b)(4).The review confirms that the unit met all material, assembly, and performance specifications.The user manual (nanoknife user manual, which is supplied to the user with this unit contains information referencing self-testing and troubleshooting protocols for self test failures.This angiodynamics hardware unit has a related disposable device however the reported complaint could not be related to the disposable device.The nanoknife completes the self-test before it allows the unit to engage with the probe or continue to the next step to start treatment.As reported, there was no harm to the patient due to the delay in procedure.The case was completed with another nanoknife unit without further complications.A review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint will continue to be monitored for trends.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|