|
|
| General |
| Study Status |
Completed |
Application Number / Requirement Number |
P110002 / PAS002 |
| Date Original Protocol Accepted |
05/16/2014
|
| Date Current Protocol Accepted |
06/03/2014
|
| Study Name |
Enhanced Surveillance System
|
| Device Name |
MOBI-C CERVICAL DISC PROSTHESIS (ONE-LEVEL INDICATION)
|
| Clinical Trial Number(s) |
NCT00389597
|
| General Study Protocol Parameters |
| Study Design |
Enhanced Surveillance
|
| Data Source |
New Data Collection
|
| Comparison Group |
No Control
|
| Analysis Type |
Descriptive
|
| Study Population |
Transit.Adolescent B(as adults): 18 yrs < 22 yrs,
Adult: At least 22 yrs
|
| Detailed Study Protocol Parameters |
| Study Objectives |
A 10-year Enhanced Surveillance Study (ESS) of the Mobi-C® Cervical Disc Prosthesis to fully characterize adverse events and complaints when the device is used in the intended patient population under general conditions of use in the United States and in the rest of the world. The objective is to collect, analyze, and submit all adverse event data.
|
| Study Population |
All patients who are implanted with the device The data on AEs will be collected by the company and reported to the FDA: 1. Through literature search (every 6 months for first 2 years and then annually thereafter) 2. AEs reported through company website 3. MDR reports 4. Annual survey of all USA physicians who were trained with the device
|
| Sample Size |
N/A
|
| Key Study Endpoints |
All adverse Events will be reported including HO, neurological complications, subsequent surgeries and etc. The data will be categorized based on severity, and device and MDR relevancy.
|
| Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up |
10 years
|
| Interim or Final Data Summary |
| Actual Number of Patients Enrolled |
3246 surgeons sent 21854 surveys
|
| Actual Number of Sites Enrolled |
N/A Annual surgeon survey: active collection of surgeon feedback annually to elicit information related to heterotopic ossification, device malfunction, device removal, or other serious device related complications.
|
| Patient Follow-up Rate |
15.5% survey response rate
|
| Final Safety Findings |
No new questions of safety or raised. Highest AE rates regarded device positioning or migration, heterotopic ossification, continuing pain, and general technical difficulty with the surgery. The sum total of all AE responses was 0.61%.
|
| Final Effect Findings |
This Enhanced Surveillance Study did not survey effectiveness.
|
| Study Strengths & Weaknesses |
Returns represent a small percentage of patients
|
| Recommendations for Labeling Changes |
No labeling change is recommended
|