|
|
| General |
| Study Status |
Completed |
Application Number / Requirement Number |
P130024 S009/ PAS002 |
| Study Name |
SFA ISR IDE Continued f/u study
|
| Device Name |
LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
|
| Clinical Trial Number(s) |
NCT01864278
|
| General Study Protocol Parameters |
| Study Design |
Prospective Cohort Study
|
| Data Source |
New Data Collection
|
| Comparison Group |
No Control
|
| Analysis Type |
Descriptive
|
| Study Population |
Adult: At least 22 yrs
|
| Detailed Study Protocol Parameters |
| Study Objectives |
Continued follow-up
|
| Study Population |
DCB
|
| Key Study Endpoints |
the composite of freedom from all-cause peri-procedural (=30 day) death and freedom at 1 year and 2 years from index limb amputation (above or below the ankle), index limb re-intervention, and index-limb-related death and (2) primary patency at 1 year and 2 years
|
| Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up |
3 years yearly
|
| Interim or Final Data Summary |
| Actual Number of Patients Enrolled |
82 DCB Subjects (53) Control Subjects (29)
|
| Actual Number of Sites Enrolled |
20
|
| Patient Follow-up Rate |
Missing data (lost + withdrew) was 9.4%% (5/53) in the DCB arm and 20.7% (6/29) in the PTA arm.
|
| Final Safety Findings |
At 12 months (365 days), the KM estimate of primary safety was 73.1% in the DCB group and 64.0% in the PTA group. At 36 months, the KM estimate of primary safety was 54.4% in the DCB group and 43.6% in the PTA group. At 36 months, the KM estimate of freedom from all cause death for the DCB arm was 88.1% for the DCB arm and 87.8% for the PTA arm.
|
| Final Effect Findings |
The primary patency at 12 months by KM estimate was 67.0% in the DCB arm and 49.5% in the PTA arm. At 24 months the primary patency was 28.9% in the DCB group and 31.0% in the PTA group by KM estimate.
|
| Study Strengths & Weaknesses |
The strengths of the study include looking at the ISR indication and the extended safety follow up. Study weaknesses include the small sample size unbalanced randomization.
|
| Recommendations for Labeling Changes |
Yes
|