|
|
| General |
| Study Status |
Completed |
Application Number / Requirement Number |
P130024 S009/ PAS003 |
| Study Name |
Lutonix Long Lesion SFA Cont f/u study
|
| Device Name |
LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
|
| Clinical Trial Number(s) |
NCT01864278
|
| General Study Protocol Parameters |
| Study Design |
Prospective Cohort Study
|
| Data Source |
Sponsor Registry
|
| Comparison Group |
No Control
|
| Analysis Type |
Descriptive
|
| Study Population |
Adult: At least 22 yrs
|
| Detailed Study Protocol Parameters |
| Study Objectives |
Continued follow-up
|
| Study Population |
DCB
|
| Key Study Endpoints |
the composite of freedom from all-cause peri-procedural (=30 day) death and freedom at 1 year and2 years from the following: index limb amputation and (above or below the ankle) and index limb re-intervention and (2) primary patency at 1 year and 2 years
|
| Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up |
2 years yearly
|
| Interim or Final Data Summary |
| Actual Number of Patients Enrolled |
125 DCB Subjects (118) Control Subjects (7)
|
| Actual Number of Sites Enrolled |
14
|
| Patient Follow-up Rate |
DCB Subjects 89.0% (105/118) Lost to follow up plus withdrew from study.
|
| Final Safety Findings |
The primary safety endpoint for the DCB group was 78.7%% (85/108) [69.8, 86.0] and was defined as the composite of freedom from all-cause peri-procedural (less than or equal to 30 day) death and freedom at 1 year from the following: index limb amputation (above or below the ankle) and index limb re-intervention.
|
| Final Effect Findings |
The primary effectiveness endpoint for the DCB group was DCB group: 58.3% (60/103) [48.1, 67.9] and represents primary patency at 12 months. Primary Patency is defined as Freedom from Clinically-Driven TLR and from Binary Restenosis.
|
| Study Strengths & Weaknesses |
The strengths of the study include looking at the long lesion length indication and the extended safety follow up. Study weaknesses include the small sample size and lack of control group.
|
| Recommendations for Labeling Changes |
No
|