|
|
| General |
| Study Status |
Completed |
Application Number / Requirement Number |
P070008 S079/ PAS001 |
| Date Original Protocol Accepted |
05/04/2017
|
| Date Current Protocol Accepted |
09/24/2019
|
| Study Name |
QP ExCELS Sentus QP Ext CRT w/ Quad LV
|
| Device Name |
PACEMAKER ICD CRT NON IMPLANTED COMPONENTS
|
| Clinical Trial Number(s) |
NCT02290028
|
| General Study Protocol Parameters |
| Study Design |
Prospective Cohort Study
|
| Data Source |
New Data Collection
|
| Comparison Group |
Objective Performance Criterion
|
| Analysis Type |
Descriptive
|
| Study Population |
Transit.Adolescent B(as adults): 18 yrs < 22 yrs,
Adult: At least 22 yrs
|
| Detailed Study Protocol Parameters |
| Study Objectives |
Confirm long-term safety of the Biotronik Sentus OTW QP left ventricular pacing leads. The evaluation of safety will be freedom from Sentus QP related complications at 5 years post-implant.
|
| Study Population |
CRT-eligible Heart Failure patients
|
| Sample Size |
Postmarket Sample Size Required: 979 Postmarket Sample Size Required including attrition = 1754
|
| Key Study Endpoints |
Primary Endpoint: The purpose is to evaluate the long-term Sentus related complication-free rate through 5 years post-implant.
|
| Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up |
5 years
|
| Interim or Final Data Summary |
| Actual Number of Patients Enrolled |
2872
|
| Actual Number of Sites Enrolled |
N/A - RWE
|
| Patient Follow-up Rate |
N/A - RWE
|
| Final Safety Findings |
Primary safety objective of complication-free rate (CFR) greater than 92.5% at 5 years post-implant for Sentus LV leads was met. 84 complications noted in 2920 Sentus leads. Lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval of CFR was 92.72%.
|
| Final Effect Findings |
N/A
|
| Study Strengths & Weaknesses |
This study’s use of real-world data captures a large representative assessment of device performance. While data granularity is limited, the study confirms there are no significant safety concerns with the device’s long term performance.
|
| Recommendations for Labeling Changes |
Labeling changes should include the study design, results, and strengths and weaknesses of the PAS.
|