|
General |
Study Status |
Completed |
Application Number / Requirement Number |
P940008 / PAS001 |
Date Original Protocol Accepted |
11/28/1995
|
Date Current Protocol Accepted |
 
|
Study Name |
PAS
|
Device Name |
RES-Q(TM) ARRHYTHMIA CONTROL DEVICE EPICARDIAL PATCH AND NON-THORACOTOMY LEAD (NTL) SYSTEMS
|
General Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Design |
Prospective Cohort Study
|
Data Source |
Sponsor Registry
|
Comparison Group |
No Control
|
Analysis Type |
Descriptive
|
Study Population |
Adult: >21
|
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Objectives |
This is a registry-based study that includes all patients who have received the Res-Q Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator System (ACD) Model 101-01 and 101-01R Epicardial Patch and Non-thoracotomy Lead System.The purpose of the registry is to monitor the performance of the epicardial lead system post-PMA approval.
|
Study Population |
The study proposed to follow the patient population enrolled in the RES Q ACD PATCH protocol to monitor the performance of the epicardial patch leads. This proposal is for the patient population enrolled in the Res Q ACD PATCH protocol IDE 900143 implanted with Res-Q/ Res-Q Micron ICD Models . These are patients who are at high risk of sudden death due to ventricular arrhythmias and have experienced one of the following situations: (1) survival of at least one episode of cardiac arrest (manifested by a loss of consciousness) due to a ventricular tachyarrhythmia, or (2) recurrent, poorly tolerated sustained ventricular tachycardia. There were 16 patients eligible for postmarket follow-up.
|
Sample Size |
16 patients eligible for postmarket follow-up
|
Key Study Endpoints |
The data endpoints were actuarial lead survival (lead failures) and fatal events.
|
Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up |
Patients are assessed periodically (approximately every 4 months) and data is reported annually .
|
Interim or Final Data Summary |
Actual Number of Patients Enrolled |
16 patients eligible for postmarket follow-up.
|
Actual Number of Sites Enrolled |
unknown
|
Patient Follow-up Rate |
15/16 had their devices removed from service or are deceased, the remaining patient has been lost to follow-up. No patients were followed-up.
|
Final Safety Findings |
The final report did not include statistical analysis for this study since there is only one patient remaining in the study.
|
Study Strengths & Weaknesses |
Weakness: The report does not include statistical analysis for this study since there is only one patient remaining in the study.
|
Recommendations for Labeling Changes |
None
|