|
General |
Study Status |
Completed |
522 Number / Requirement Number |
PS110004 / PSS001 |
Date Original Plan Accepted |
04/24/2012
|
Date Current Plan Accepted |
01/13/2017
|
Study Name |
Time to Revision
|
Device Name |
Total temporomandibular joint replacement system
|
Root Document Number |
P020016
|
General Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Design |
Prospective & Retrospective Study
|
Data Source |
New Data Collection
|
Comparison Group |
No Control
|
Analysis Type |
Descriptive
|
Study Population |
Transit. Adolescent B (as adults) : 18-21 yrs,
Adult: >21
|
Detailed Study Protocol Parameters |
Study Objectives |
The study design includes the following two groups/arms: 1. A prospective, observational study through 2015 to collect follow-up data on all subjects who received a Biomet TMJ Replacement System between 1995 - 2010 and for who Biomet holds current contact information. 2. A retrospective review to collect data on demographics, clinical history and diagnosis for subjects treated with the Biomet TMJ Replacement System between 2005 - 2010
|
Study Population |
18 to 21 yrs; Adult 21+
|
Sample Size |
329 patients
|
Key Study Endpoints |
Primary endpoint: The revision rate of the implant for patients who received the Biomet TMJ Replacement Device between 1995 and 2010 and who participate in the prospective observational study.
|
Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up |
FU Visits: Annually; Length of FU: from 2 to 20 years
|
Interim or Final Data Summary |
Actual Number of Patients Enrolled |
498
|
Actual Number of Sites Enrolled |
1
|
Patient Followup Rate |
100%
|
Final Safety Findings |
Reasons for first SSIs included fibrous ankylosis (21.4%), heterotopic bone formation (17.9%), infection (14.3%), and pain/swelling (12.5%).
|
Final Effectiveness Findings |
The rate of first subsequent surgical interventions (SSIs) was 11.2% (56/498), the rate of reoperations was 7.0% (35/498) and the rate of implant removals was 4.2% (21/498). The probability of survival was 96% at 3 years, 94% at 5 years and 86% at 10 years post- operative.
|
Study Strengths and Weaknesses |
Strengths: Large sample size, long follow-up period, high follow-up rate. Weaknesses:Follow up was done by mailing questionnaires. No physical examination was conducted.
|
Recommendations for Labeling Changes |
Label to be updated with the time to revision results
|