|
|
| General |
| Study Status |
Completed |
| 522 Number / Requirement Number |
PS110004 / PSS001 |
| Date Original Plan Accepted |
04/24/2012
|
| Date Current Plan Accepted |
01/13/2017
|
| Study Name |
Time to Revision
|
| Device Name |
Total temporomandibular joint replacement system
|
| Root Document Number |
P020016
|
| General Study Protocol Parameters |
| Study Design |
Prospective & Retrospective Study
|
| Data Source |
New Data Collection
|
| Comparison Group |
No Control
|
| Analysis Type |
Descriptive
|
| Study Population |
Transit. Adolescent B (as adults) : 18-21 yrs,
Adult: >21
|
| Detailed Study Protocol Parameters |
| Study Objectives |
The study design includes the following two groups/arms: 1. A prospective, observational study through 2015 to collect follow-up data on all subjects who received a Biomet TMJ Replacement System between 1995 - 2010 and for who Biomet holds current contact information. 2. A retrospective review to collect data on demographics, clinical history and diagnosis for subjects treated with the Biomet TMJ Replacement System between 2005 - 2010
|
| Study Population |
18 to 21 yrs; Adult 21+
|
| Sample Size |
329 patients
|
| Key Study Endpoints |
Primary endpoint: The revision rate of the implant for patients who received the Biomet TMJ Replacement Device between 1995 and 2010 and who participate in the prospective observational study.
|
| Follow-up Visits and Length of Follow-up |
FU Visits: Annually; Length of FU: from 2 to 20 years
|
| Interim or Final Data Summary |
| Actual Number of Patients Enrolled |
498
|
| Actual Number of Sites Enrolled |
1
|
| Patient Followup Rate |
100%
|
| Final Safety Findings |
Reasons for first SSIs included fibrous ankylosis (21.4%), heterotopic bone formation (17.9%), infection (14.3%), and pain/swelling (12.5%).
|
| Final Effectiveness Findings |
The rate of first subsequent surgical interventions (SSIs) was 11.2% (56/498), the rate of reoperations was 7.0% (35/498) and the rate of implant removals was 4.2% (21/498). The probability of survival was 96% at 3 years, 94% at 5 years and 86% at 10 years post- operative.
|
| Study Strengths and Weaknesses |
Strengths: Large sample size, long follow-up period, high follow-up rate. Weaknesses:Follow up was done by mailing questionnaires. No physical examination was conducted.
|
| Recommendations for Labeling Changes |
Label to be updated with the time to revision results
|