510k # : k160229.Device evaluation: 1 unit of lot c1557547 of echo-hd-22-ebus-o-c was returned opened in its original packaging.Lab evaluation: the device related to this occurrence underwent a laboratory evaluation on 17 apr 2020.The returned device lab findings and observations can be referred through the attached files.The distal tip of the needle was observed to be broken.Document review including ifu review prior to distribution, all echo-hd-22-ebus-o-c devices are subjected to functional checks and visual inspection to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.A review of the manufacturing records for echo-hd-22-ebus-o-c of lot number c1557547 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.The review of relevant manufacturing records, confirms the failure mode has not previously occurred with the current lot number.Based on the information available to date, there is no evidence to suggest that there are any manufacturing issues associated with lot number c1557547.The instructions for use, ifu0109-6 which accompanies this device, instructs the user to; "visually inspect with particular attention to kinks, bends and breaks.If an abnormality is detected that would prohibit proper working condition, do not use" and "this device is intended for use with an olympus ebus scope".There is evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use in relation to the type of scope used (ifu0109-6) root cause review: a definitive root cause could be attributed to user error as the user used the device with an incompatible device, as per information provided, a fuji scope was used and as per ifu ¿this device is intended for use with an olympus ebus scope¿, therefore the user did not follow the instructions for use.It is not possible to know how the device performs with an incompatible device therefore the distal needle break could have been induced by the scope.Summary: complaint is confirmed as the failure was verified in the laboratory.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.The broken needle tip was removed by the bronchoscope.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|