• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CONVATEC DOMINICAN REPUBLIC INC DUODERM/GRANUFLEX/DUOACTIVE - MOISTURE RETENTIVE DUODERM CGF DRESSING; DRESSING, WOUND, OCCLUSIVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CONVATEC DOMINICAN REPUBLIC INC DUODERM/GRANUFLEX/DUOACTIVE - MOISTURE RETENTIVE DUODERM CGF DRESSING; DRESSING, WOUND, OCCLUSIVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 187976
Device Problem Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).Based on the available information, this event is deemed to be a reportable malfunction.To date no additional information has been received.Should additional information become available, a follow-up report will be submitted.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported "dressing on laser-treatment wound that is low-exuding, but the dressing is too sticky to be removed from the wound, causing severe wound-dressing adhesion, in addition to inner layer abscission." dressing was in place one day.No harm to patient.A video and photographs depicting the removal technique were provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Historical complaints review: on 20/apr/2021, a query was ran in trackwise 8.7 in order to verify the complaints reported for the lots numbers involved and as result, no additional complaints were reported.Historical nonconformance review: on 20/apr/2021, a query was ran in trackwise 8.7 looking for any nonconformance / capa (s) associated to the failure mode ¿the dressing was too sticky to remove from the wound¿ for the lots numbers involved and as result, no nonconformance / capa (s) for these failure mode were generated during the manufacturing process of the referenced lots.Returned sample evaluation: photos is available for evaluation, no samples are available for testing.Based on the evaluated photos, complaint reported have been confirmed.Batch record revision results: on 20/apr/2021, a batch record review was performed by complaint investigator (b)(4), for bulk lots numbers in the attachment #1, were manufactured in the elc #10.A revision was conducted and review the testing performed that is as follow: all the test are performed following process instructions pi22-022 version 8.0 ovelap and pi31-103 revision 11.0 elc #10.The rolling ball, adhesive test per tm-011, strip to strip, t-peel, visual inspection per tm-017.The overall thickness and mass thickness also for tm-011, the tm-085: determination of bond strength, every ½ hour and documented in the mr31-103, version 7.0.The bulk lots for the mass formulation are shown in the table attachment 1, description mass 177a, machine workcentre amk mixer large #2 (mixer 6), workcentre amk mixer large #3 (mixer 7).Those lots were manufactured following the applicable procedures, all machine and testing parameters were in accordance with the applicable procedures and specifications pi22-084 short cycle amk mixing 1002207 177-a (work center (b)(4)) version 7.0.In this line qa performed a visual inspection every two (2) hour and documented the results in the applicable annexes from dr-sop-0063, version 20.0.With satisfactory results, no nc or discrepancies were noticed during this batch records review.According to the instruction for used corresponding to the lots reported by the customer removing the dressing: press down on the skin with one hand and carefully lift and edge of the dressing with your other hand.Leave the dressing in place, (not more than 7 days) unless it is uncomfortable, leaking, or there are clinical signs of infection.According to the description of the defect reported by the client, no harm reported.Process description: a revision of the assembly process described in the applicable process instructions (see graph in nonconformance report) were performed in order to determine in which part of the process the reported defect can be generated.Process summary: pi31-103 process instructions for elc 10, 6.3 process summary: (dressing duoderm® extra thin) duoderm® extra thin: 177-a mass that has aged not less than 3 hours since discharge from mixer is placed into the extruder hopper where it is fed to the extruder by the combined actions of two feed rolls and the extruder screw.Roped or log feed stock may be used.The mass is conveyed, compressed, heated, and formed into an adhesive sheet by the actions of the extruder screw, barrel, and die.Once extruded, the mass is calendered to specified thickness and laminated with a layer of medifilm coated paper (top) and a layer of srp.A release liner is added during calendering to create an easy peel tab in the final product.The four layers - paper, mass, release liner, and medifilm -- are drawn through a rotary die and cut to the proper dimension.The completed dressings are inspected and stacked onto trays to be placed on a bulk storage rack to await the next processing step.Process summary: mixer, the aspiration filter and nitrogen generation systems must be operating before the process can begin.All components must be weighed before beginning the actual mixing process.Components are added as specified to amk sigma blade kneader-extruder m07 (work center (b)(4)), heated to a specific temperature, and kneaded for a prescribed length of time.The styrene-isoprene-styrene (sis) component is pre-processed in an extruder prior to addition to the mixer.The compounded mass is discharged through the extruder at the base of the mixer and cut into loaves.The loaves are placed onto racks of trays lines with silicone release paper until delivery to the next processing step.Risk evaluation: the reported condition is wnd-pmc03.08 adhesive dressing requires excessive force for removal from skin (i.E.Difficult to remove).No harm was reported from any of the complainants.As per ¿wi-0461 phri-002-wnd¿ version 1.0, severity reported for those cases is low.The highest actual severity reported has been hc5.3 infection.The severity for this pmc remains unchanged based on the potential for recurrence.This malfunction will not be reported and will be continuously monitored and reviewed for any changes in the observed actual severity.Additional information per escalation committee: 22 apr 2020 case submitted to escalation to confirm dressing acceptable to be used around eye/eyelid area.22 apr 2020 per escalation: reporter states duoderm product was difficult to remove around the eye.Photo reviewed.Committee reviewed ifu to confirm if the product was contraindicated in use around the eye.No contraindications found.Product was only used for 1 day.Committee requests additional information.What removal technique was used? how was the product removed? did they use the taffy pull method? did they remove from the edge or surrounding area or pull from the middle? 29 apr 2020 per escalation: case previously discussed in escalation.Follow up information and video received.Committee reviewed video.Dressing was used around the eyelids.Committee noted there is no misuse but the area around the eyes/face is very warm and a delicate place for the product and product removal.An eye procedure is a very specialized procedure which will usually use more specialized dressing applied.Committee confirmed there is no contraindication to use around the eye.No harm or tissue damage experienced.Committee requests the manufacturing site investigation determine if the lot was made prior to making the dressing at the upper end of the specification or after.Committee assigned wnd-pmc3.8 adhesive dressing requires excessive force for removal from skin (i.E.Difficult to remove).Severity 4.No harm reported.Conclusions: based on the results of the preliminary investigation, some harm was reported from the complainants, photos is available for evaluation, no samples are available for testing.Based on the evaluated photos, complaint reported have been confirmed.Nevertheless, no additional action is required, due to, according to the preliminary investigation and evaluations performed during the manufacturing process, it was concluded that this defect could not be generated during the manufacturing process.However, per escalation committee confirmed there is no contraindication to use around the eye; the instructions for use of the products (ifu 1268507g1, 1001033c2) clearly specify correct the methodology and guidance to use the product."should additional information become available, a follow-up report will be submitted.Fda registration number reporting site: 1049092 manufacturing site: 9618003.
 
Event Description
To date no additional patient or event details have been received.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DUODERM/GRANUFLEX/DUOACTIVE - MOISTURE RETENTIVE DUODERM CGF DRESSING
Type of Device
DRESSING, WOUND, OCCLUSIVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CONVATEC DOMINICAN REPUBLIC INC
km 18.5 parque industrial
itabo, s.a. haina
san cristobal
Manufacturer (Section G)
CONVATEC DOMINICAN REPUBLIC INC
km 18.5 parque industrial
itabo, s.a. haina
san cristobal
Manufacturer Contact
pamela meadows
7815 national service road
suite 600
greensboro, NC 27409
3365424679
MDR Report Key10025877
MDR Text Key189908749
Report Number9618003-2020-10733
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/05/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number187976
Device Lot Number9F00673
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/13/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-