• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. ARTEMIS NEURO EVACUATION DEVICE; GWG

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. ARTEMIS NEURO EVACUATION DEVICE; GWG Back to Search Results
Model Number AP28-A
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Seizures (2063); Tissue Damage (2104); Brain Injury (2219)
Event Date 03/21/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product was not returned for evaluation.From the information provided, there is no indication that there was any device malfunction, non conformance, or misuse that contributed to the reported event.Potential adverse events in the labeling with the artemis neuro evacuation device include, but are not limited to, seizures, decreased consciousness, re-bleeding, thromboembolic events, including death.Therefore, it was determined that the reported adverse events were anticipated complications.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2020, the patient underwent a thrombectomy procedure to treat an intracerebral hemorrhage (ich) using an artemis neuro evacuation device (artemis).There were no reported procedural complications.On (b)(6) 2020, the patient was discharged to a rehabilitation facility.On (b)(6) 2020, the patient was noticed to begin experiencing seizure-like activity.The patient¿s eyes would roll back, their body would shake, and the patient would take several deep breaths.These symptoms would last for a few seconds before resolving and would reoccur every thirty minutes.On (b)(6) 2020, while undergoing physical therapy, these symptoms were noticed to reoccur every two minutes.The patient would clamp their eyes shut.Upon opening their eyes, the patient¿s eyes would roll back.It was unknown if the patient was experiencing seizures or if the patient was having pulmonary embolism.On (b)(6) 2020, the patient was sent to the emergency room regarding these symptoms for further evaluation and treatment; subsequently, the patient was hospitalized.Computed tomography (ct) scans for the brain and chest, an electroencephalogram (eeg) and ventilation-perfusion scan of the lung were performed.On a ct scan, it showed the patient had new encephalomalacia in the left insular cortex.The patient was then treated with medication and underwent another medical procedure for the seizure-like activity.No action was taken for the encephalomalacia.As of (b)(6) 2020, the seizure-like activity and encephalomalacia are ongoing.The seizure-like activity and encephalomalacia were adjudicated to be serious adverse events with a definite relationship to the artemis and the index procedure.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2020, the patient underwent a thrombectomy procedure to treat an intracerebral hemorrhage (ich) using an artemis neuro evacuation device (artemis).There were no reported procedural complications.On (b)(6) 2020, the patient was discharged to a rehabilitation facility.On (b)(6) 2020, the patient was noticed to begin experiencing seizure-like activity.The patient¿s eyes would roll back, their body would shake, and the patient would take several deep breaths.These symptoms would last for a few seconds before resolving and would reoccur every thirty minutes.On (b)(6) 2020, while undergoing physical therapy, these symptoms were noticed to reoccur every two minutes.The patient would clamp their eyes shut.Upon opening their eyes, the patient¿s eyes would roll back.It was unknown if the patient was experiencing seizures or if the patient was having pulmonary embolism.On (b)(6) 2020, the patient was sent to the emergency room regarding these symptoms for further evaluation and treatment; subsequently, the patient was hospitalized.Computed tomography (ct) scans for the brain and chest, an electroencephalogram (eeg) and ventilation-perfusion scan of the lung were performed.On a ct scan, it showed the patient had new encephalomalacia in the left insular cortex.The patient was then treated with medication and underwent another medical procedure for the seizure-like activity.No action was taken for the encephalomalacia.As of (b)(6) 2020, the seizure-like activity and encephalomalacia are ongoing.The seizure-like activity and encephalomalacia were adjudicated to be serious adverse events with a relationship to the artemis and the index procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following section has been updated based on additional information provided by the penumbra clinical team on (b)(6) 2020: section b.Box 5.Describe event or problem h3 other text: placeholder.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following section has been updated based on additional information provided by the penumbra clinical team on 16-dec-2020: section b.Box 5.Describe event or problem.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2020, the patient underwent a thrombectomy procedure to treat an intracerebral hemorrhage (ich) using an artemis neuro evacuation device (artemis).There were no reported procedural complications.On (b)(6) 2020, the patient was discharged to a rehabilitation facility.On (b)(6) 2020, the patient was noticed to begin experiencing seizure-like activity.The patient¿s eyes would roll back, their body would shake, and the patient would take several deep breaths.These symptoms would last for a few seconds before resolving and would reoccur every thirty minutes.On (b)(6) 2020, while undergoing physical therapy, these symptoms were noticed to reoccur every two minutes.The patient would clamp their eyes shut.Upon opening their eyes, the patient¿s eyes would roll back.It was unknown if the patient was experiencing seizures or if the patient was having pulmonary embolism.On (b)(6) 2020, the patient was sent to the emergency room regarding these symptoms for further evaluation and treatment; subsequently, the patient was hospitalized.Computed tomography (ct) scans for the brain and chest, an electroencephalogram (eeg) and ventilation-perfusion scan of the lung were performed.On a ct scan, it showed the patient had new encephalomalacia in the left insular cortex.The patient was then treated with medication and underwent another medical procedure for the seizure-like activity.No action was taken for the encephalomalacia.As of (b)(6) 2020, the seizure-like activity and encephalomalacia are ongoing.On (b)(6) 2020, the encephalomalacia was determined to be part of the evolution of the ich and not an adverse event.The seizure-like activity was adjudicated to be a serious adverse event with a relationship to the artemis and the index procedure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARTEMIS NEURO EVACUATION DEVICE
Type of Device
GWG
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key10040873
MDR Text Key191393432
Report Number3005168196-2020-00638
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GWG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548017877
UDI-Public00814548017877
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K171332
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Study,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,02/14/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/08/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/13/2020
Device Model NumberAP28-A
Device Catalogue NumberAP28
Device Lot NumberS10002
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received12/16/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/14/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention; Other;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-