Manufacturing review: a lot history review was performed.This is the only complaint to date for this lot number.Therefore, a device history record (dhr) review is not required.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Post filter final spot image revealed that the filter device was in normal configuration positioned below the lowest renal vein.Subsequently few years post filter deployment, patient expired due to pulmonary embolus and presumed deep venous thrombosis.Later autopsy revealed, bilateral pulmonary emboli.Also, non-occlusive emboli were found in main pulmonary arteries, resolving infarct of lower lobe of the right lung and a filter was in place in inferior vena cava with entrapped embolus.However, the medical records allege no device deficiency.Additionally, it can be confirmed that the patient experienced pe post deployment.However, the relationship to the filter is unknown.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
|