|
Model Number 228151 |
Device Problems
Premature Activation (1484); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 05/18/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by affiliate via email that a meniscal repair surgery was performed, in which a truespan 12 degree peek was used.At the moment of activating the point, it did not come out of the gun and remains stuck, a second shot was made and the two points were thrown so it was not possible to use the implant.More implants were available to continue surgery without delay or harm to the patient.The device is available to be returned for evaluation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary = > the complaint device was not returned after multiple attempts for device return, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.With the information provided, and without the complaint device to evaluate, we cannot determine a root cause for the reported failure.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number (6l43511), and no non-conformances were identified.Should the device ever be received back in the future, this complaint file will be reopened at that time and an evaluation will be performed and documented.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: according to the information provided, it was reported that meniscal repair surgery was performed, in which a 12 ° truespan implant ref: 228151 lot 6l43511 was used.At the moment of activating the point, it did not come out of the gun and remains stucked, a second shot was made and the two points were thrown so it was not possible to use the implant the complaint device was received and evaluated.Visual observations confirm that both implant are deployed from the needle shaft assembly.In other hand, the silicon sleeve didn¿t present any physical damages.The complaint can be confirmed.The possible root cause for the deploy failure reported could be related to the needle insertion which have caused blocking insertion of the first implant, and when this occurred may have felt resistance and did not pull the trigger all the way.This would result in the first implant being only partially deployed.Then, when the trigger was pulled again both implants would be deployed at the same time.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number:6l43511, and no non-conformances were identified.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|