Results of investigation: it was reported that patient was experiencing acute hip pain because of a twisted knee.No fall occurred.A broken ceramic head was diagnosed radiologically.No medical documentation was provided and a thorough medical assessment could therefore not be conducted.The part in question was returned for investigation.A visual investigation could confirm the fracture of the ball head, which intent use is treatment.A material assessment showed that microstructure of the material met the requirements.The expected primary metal transfer observed was not equally distributed on the cone of the ball head.This may indicate a disturbance at the interface between stem and ball head.The origin of the fracture cannot be determined, however the disturbance at the interface between the stem and the ball head, leading to an increase of mechanical stress, may have caused the fracture of the ceramic ball head.A document history review was performed and there were no deviations detected.There are no indications that the part failed to match specification at the time of manufacturing.A complaint history review revealed further complaints for the batch in question.The risk of a ball head fracture is covered through the corresponding risk management files.In the ifu (12.23.Ed 05/16), implant fractures are listed as potential risks.To date, based on available evidence, the need for further action is not indicated.Smith and nephew will monitor this device for further similar incidents.The device will be retained.
|