No product samples were returned for investigation, however a photograph was provided and evaluated.The photo shows two tegos.Leakage is evident from under the seal of one tego.The exact source of the leak is not clear from the image provided.No other damage or anomalies can be seen.The device history review for lot number 4080906 was reviewed and there were no relevant non-conformances found that would have contributed to the reported complaint.Based on the photo provided, the reported complaint of leakage can be confirmed.Without a returned sample a probable cause cannot be determined.
|
The customer stated a patient was admitted to the hemodialysis room, wandering on her own, subsequent discharged from therapy in adequate conditions, without complications or events.The patient was bleeding from the vascular access that impregnated the orifice gauze and the one that covered the catheter lumens.Under aseptic technique, the access was checked, it was noted a healthy orifice, without leakage of lumens; however, the tego rubber had a slight blood drip that increased with mobilization.The clamps were closed, althorugh the catheter material was already evidenced worn out.The lumens were left with the luer lock, covered with sterile material, gauze, and fixomull.The patient stayed under clinical observation, but no further bleeding was evident.There event occurred during patient use, but no adverse event was reported and no one was harmed as a result of the event.
|