(b)(4).All available information was investigated, and the reported deformation due to compressive stress that was noted during the returned device analysis was confirmed.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar complaints reported from this lot.All available information was investigated, and the reported deformation due to compressive stress appears to be due to procedural circumstances/user technique.The reported off-label use of the device was an outcome of use error as steerable guide catheter (sgc) was used to treat tricuspid regurgitation.It should be noted that per the steerable guide catheter instructions for use states that the steerable guide catheter is used for introducing various cardiovascular catheters into the left side of the heart through the interatrial septum.The off-label use did not likely contribute to the reported issue.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.The additional mitraclip device referenced is filed under a separate medwatch report number.
|
This is filed to report damaged steerable guide catheter (sgc) tip found during returned device analysis.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat functional tricuspid regurgitation (tr) with a grade of 4.It was noted thin leaflets and imaging was difficult.The first clip was successfully deployed.A second clip delivery system (cds) was advanced to the tricuspid valve for off-label use; however, the clip was unable to grasp the leaflets due to the poor imaging.Therefore, a decision was made to remove the cds.But, when the cds was retracted back into the steerable guide catheter (sgc), one clip arm became caught on the sgc tip.Then a loud pop sound was heard, and the clip became detached from the cds, but the clip was still attached via the lock and gripper lines.The clip became inverted, but since the clip was no longer attached to the cds, the clip could not be closed.This resulted in a clinically significant delay in the procedure, and a surgical-down was planned.The clip was briefly stuck on tissue during removal from the vein, and the clip dislodged from the cds.Both the sgc and cds were removed, and the clip was ultimately removed through surgical down.The patient was sent to recovery.The lock line of the cds was examined outside the patient¿s body.The lock line was observed to be separated in two pieces.One clip was implanted, reducing mr to 2.The returned device analysis revealed the sgc soft tip was deformed.No additional information was provided.
|