According to the customer, the abl800 flex (i902-754r1296n0004) performed wrong readings of the barcode, which consequently resulted in patient date mix-up.At 8:37 am, a sample was introduced in the abl805 (patient (b)(6)), while the analysis was taking place on the equipment, they called from the secretariat to say that patient (b)(6) was about to enter for collection, but in the system the sample was already being processed.This would be impossible because the patient had not even had the sample collected yet.When they went to see the equipment, the patient was wrongly identified, that is, the barcode reader read (b)(6) when it should have read (b)(6).
|
D5 has been filled out with health prof.As the received information has been reevaluated.G3: corrected data: aware date was originally estimated in mdr initial, as it was unknown.Originator has since then updated aware date to 23jun2020.As the aware date update was requested 20aug2020, this has been filled out in g3 in mdr follow up.
|