Manufacturing review: a lot history review was performed.This is the only complaint to date for this lot number.Therefore, a device history record (dhr) review is not required.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.The medical records included images.The image review was documented in the medical records.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately nine years later, computed tomography revealed that few tines of filter extending into the lumen abutting the duodenum and aorta.Subsequently eight months later computed tomography revealed that redemonstration of infrarenal inferior vena cava filter with tines extending beyond the caval lumen.Eventually five days later, filter retrieval was scheduled but it was able to partially removed.Approximately twenty one days later patient suffered with low back pain and an x-ray was done for lumbar spine and it revealed that filter was present with 2 of the legs extending superiorly.Subsequently eight days later patient suffered with abdominal pain so x- ray was performed, it revealed that filter projecting over the expected location of the infrarenal inferior vena cava and two of the limbs of the filter were noted to be directed towards right upper quadrant.Approximately fourteen days later patient presented for post failed filter removal, mr venogram showed the suprarenal inferior vena cava was small in caliber but questionable thin internal filling defect versus flow artifact but no occlusion was seen.No occlusion was apparent within the inferior vena cava below the filter or in the bilateral iliac veins.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for alleged perforation of the ivc, retrieval difficulties and material deformation.However, the investigation is inconclusive for filter tilt.Additionally, it can be confirmed that the patient experienced thrombus above the filter post deployment.However, the relationship to the filter is unknown.Based on the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.((b)(4), (expiry date: 04/2012).
|