• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SENDX MEDICAL INC ABL80 CO OX

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SENDX MEDICAL INC ABL80 CO OX Back to Search Results
Model Number 393-841
Device Problem High Readings (2459)
Patient Problems No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Date of awareness is estimated to the day the complaint was openend internally in radiometer complaint handling system.Internal capa will be initiated at sendx to handle the late reporting.
 
Event Description
According to the complaint, a customer is frustrated with too many bad sensor cassettes.The first sensor cassette replacement request was due to a considerable discrepancy noticed on po2.When a comparison measurement was made with the same patient's blood on another brand (rapidpoint machine) in 2 different areas, it showed a 20-30 point difference from the abl80.The customer claims that the abl80 co ox is showing higher po2 values, which can significantly affect a patient's diagnosis of hypoxia.The customer reports that even though the abl80 shows a bias when comparing with the rapidpoint, the abl80 does not display any errors and the machine is running fine, all system cycles and external qc are passed.Abl80 co ox - pao2: 96 mmhg.Comparison 1 - pao2: 66.9 mmhg.Comparison 2 - pao2: 66.6 mmhg.Biggest discrepancy: 96-66.6= 29.4 mmhg (false high).There are no reports of death, serious injury or maltreatment.Also, no information regarding gender or age of the patients.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It has been found that the two additional patients that were informed about in follow-up report 1 are not part of the original report after all.What happened was that the customer moved the analyzer (with serial number: (b)(6)) to a different location, and the field service engineer just went to the same location in the hospital without checking.It is also confirmed that the customer has only complaint over the analyzer with serial number: (b)(6).Radiometer has investigated the device history record for the sensor cassettes, which verifies that the sensor cassettes passed all testing procedures at sendx prior to being released.The preliminary investigation has not been able to confirm a root cause which at this point remains unknown.Component code 4756 has been chosen in h6 as no other codes applies to this scenario.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Radiometer has been informed that 2 other patients were involved in this incident.Results from the two patients can be seen below: patient 2: (b)(6) 2020 08:39 abl80 co-ox po2 results: 123mmhg; (b)(6) 2020 08:42 abl80 co-ox po2 results: 125mmhg; (b)(6) 2020 08:48 abl90 flex po2 result: 100mmhg; biggest discrepancy: 25 mmhg.Patient 3: (b)(6) 2020 08:17 abl80 co-ox po2 results: 98mmhg; (b)(6) 2020 08:19 abl80 co-ox po2 results: 112mmhg; (b)(6) 2020 08:26 abl90 po2 result: 88.3mmhg; biggest discrepancy: 23.7 mmhg.There are no reports of serious injury.The h6 codes have been updaated to match the new coding system.The component code in h6 has not been filled out as it currently is not known which component potentially may be affected.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The root cause investigation has been finalized and it has not been possible to identify the root cause which remains unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ABL80 CO OX
Type of Device
ABL80 CO OX
Manufacturer (Section D)
SENDX MEDICAL INC
1945 palmoar oaks way
carlsbad, ca
MDR Report Key10275381
MDR Text Key241832455
Report Number2027541-2020-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CHL
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K080370
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/21/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/15/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Model Number393-841
Device Catalogue Number393-841
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/17/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-