As reported, a 23mm sapien xt valve implanted in the aortic position, ¿failed¿ 6 years post implant.A non-edwards valve was implanted in the sapien xt valve.Information regarding the mode of failure or patient symptoms due to the failing valve was not provided.Post valve in valve (viv) status of the patient is not known at the time of the report.
|
Additional information: section h6: evaluation codes; section h10: narrative text.The valve was not returned to edwards for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient.Per the instruction for use (ifu), valve stenosis, regurgitation and device degeneration area potential risks associated with the use of the bioprosthetic heart valves.Valve degeneration may present as an increased gradient/velocity, decreased valve area and/or central regurgitation.This may result in symptoms such as sob and decreased exercise tolerance.Structural valve degeneration (svd) refers to changes intrinsic to the valve, and can include failure modes such as wear, calcification, leaflet tear, stent creep, leaflet disruption, or leaflet retraction.Svd may be mild and not require any intervention or it may be moderate to severe.It can cause the heart to work harder to eject blood from the ventricle.Depending on the severity it could be an indication for valve replacement or medical intervention.Tissue calcification is a very common failure mode.The mechanisms for bioprosthetic heart valve tissue calcification are not yet fully understood.Many factors can contribute to the onset and propagation of calcification including patient related (e.G.Patient age, disease state, immune status, and other co-morbidities), pharmacological, and intrinsic properties of the valve itself.It is widely understood that patients with chronic renal disease and prior history of calcific stenosis of the native valve may be predisposed to bioprosthetic calcification.In this particular case, despite multiple investigational attempts, it was not possible to obtain additional details regarding the reason for the degeneration of the sapien xt valve 6 years post implant.To date, information regarding the patient (medical records, valve in valve procedure op notes) have not been received for review.A supplemental report will be submitted in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when and if additional information becomes available.In this case, based on the limited information provided, the root cause for the valve degeneration 6 years post valve implant could not be confirmed, but may be related to the patient factors not provided or pre-existing valvular disease process.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.
|
Additional information: section h10: narrative text.Medical record review revealed 6 years post implant, the 23mm sapien xt valve was failing due to severe stenosis.A valve in valve procedure with a 26mm non-edwards transcatheter valve was planned, however, due to the tortuosity in the right common iliac artery, the valve was not able to be traversed into the distal abdominal aorta.Due to the significant calcification and tortuous iliac anatomy due to an abdominal aortic aneurysm, the decision was made to abort the procedure.At the time of the report, the sapien xt valve remains implanted in the patient.
|