Investigation result: description of incoming product condition.The valve was received submersed in an unidentified liquid in a plastic container.Patient information: age: (b)(6) years.Weight: (b)(6) kg.Height: unknown.Gender: female.Date of implantation: (b)(6) 2020.Date of removal: (b)(6) 2020.Visual inspection: no significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection.In the delivery liquid are visible deposits detected.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the valve is permeable.Adjustment test: the m.Blue 5 was tested and is adjustable to all specified pressures.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function is fully operational and the braking force is within the given tolerances.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of dysfunction, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valve is tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the valve operates within the accepted tolerance in both positions.Results: first we performed a visual inspection of the m.Blue 5.No significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection.In the delivery liquid are visible deposits.Next we tested the permeability, adjustability, and opening pressure of the valve, as well as the brake functionality and brake force.The m.Blue 5 valve operates as expected and met all specifications.Finally, we have dismantled the valve.There were no visible deposits observed inside the valve.Based on our investigation, we are unable to substantiate the claim of occlusion and dysfunction.At the time of our investigation, the valve was operating within the specified tolerances.How the above-mentioned functional impairment occurred is not revealed to us at the time of the examination.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke (b)(4).No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
|