While no direct cause of the trajectory deviation could be determined, it may have been related to the material discrepancy that was discovered during the registration process.The double image that was present in the patient scan could have caused the arch to be misrepresented, subsequently causing the implant to be placed at the incorrect location during planning.This material discrepancy was reported to the doctor, who chose to proceed with the current materials.Additional testing will be conducted if the surgical guide is returned.See attached to reference the supporting analysis for additional details.(b)(4).
|
The doctor used the guide for implant surgery.Implants were placed at sites #2, 3, 10, 12, and 14.The doctor then took a post-operative scan, from which he observed that implant #10 had perforated the buccal plate.The implant was removed and the area was grafted.All other implants were successfully placed.No seating issues were observed.
|