• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM COOK EUROPE UNKNOWN DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM COOK EUROPE UNKNOWN DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Structural Problem (2506); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problems Great Vessel Perforation (2152); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative

Manufacturers ref# (b)(4). Catalog# is unknown but referred to as cook celect filter. Non health care professional. Summary of investigational findings: the reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date. Filter fracture has been reported and may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic. Fracture of a filter leg may be due to repetitive motion on a filter leg in an unusual, stressed position, such as a filter leg penetrating/perforating the ivc; or a filter leg being caught in a side branch (e. G. , a renal vein). Other potential causes of filter fracture may include excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e. G. , a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter). Retrieval of a fractured filter or filter fragments (including embolized fragments) using endovascular techniques has been reported. Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: filter fracture, filter or filter fragment embolization, trauma to adjacent structures. Filter interacts with ivc wall, e. G. Penetration/perforation/embedment. This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic. Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e. G. , a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter). Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration. Physician practice guidelines and published guidance from regulatory agencies recommend that patients with indwelling filters undergo routine follow-up. The risks/benefits of filter retrieval should be considered for each patient during follow-up. Once protection from pe is no longer necessary, filter retrieval should be considered. Filter retrieval should be attempted when feasible and clinically indicated. Filter retrieval is a patient-specific, clinically complex decision; the decision to remove a filter should be based on each patient¿s individual risk/benefit profile (e. G. , a patient¿s continued need for protection from pe compared to their experience with and (or) ongoing risk of experiencing filter-related complications). For all retrievable ivc filters, retrieval becomes more challenging with time, and this is commonly due to encapsulation of the filter legs or hook (in a tilted filter) by tissue ingrowth. The filter is designed to be retrieved with the günther tulip vena cava filter retrieval set. It may also be retrieved with the cloversnare® vascular retriever. Cook has not performed testing to evaluate the safety or effectiveness of filter retrieval using other retrieval systems or techniques. The published clinical literature includes descriptions of alternative techniques for filter retrieval; use of these techniques varies according to physician experience, patient anatomy, and filter position. The safety or effectiveness of these alternative retrieval techniques has not been established. Specific for ¿embedded¿ a filter that is embedded in the wall of the ivc may be difficult to retrieve. For all retrievable ivc filters, retrieval becomes more challenging with time, and this is commonly due to encapsulation of the filter legs or hook (in a tilted filter) by tissue ingrowth. No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e. G. Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava. Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c. F. R. 803. 56. Cook medical will continue to monitor for similar events.

 
Event Description

Description of event according to initial reporter: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on (b)(6) 2012. [pt] has suffered serious injury as a result of the implantation of the cook celect filter. Specifically, the filter has perforated [pt]'s ivc with multiple struts. Additionally, one of the struts fractured and this piece remains inside [pt], despite the removal of the remainder of the cook celect filter. " patient outcome: it is alleged that "[pt] is at risk for future migration of the celect filter piece. [pt] faces numerous health risks, including the risk of death. [pt] will require ongoing medical care and monitoring for the rest of his life. It is unknown if the fractured filter piece can be retrieved by any means other than an open surgical procedure. ".

 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand NameUNKNOWN
Type of DeviceDTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632
DA 4632
Manufacturer (Section G)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632
Manufacturer Contact
thomas hessner kirk
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632 
56868686
MDR Report Key10383638
MDR Text Key202368944
Report Number3002808486-2020-00755
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type CONSUMER
Reporter Occupation
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/26/2020
1 Device Was Involved in the Event
1 Patient Was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/10/2020
Is This An Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is This A Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device LOT NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available For Evaluation? No
Is The Reporter A Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA?
Event Location No Information
Date Manufacturer Received08/10/2020
Was Device Evaluated By Manufacturer? Device Not Returned To Manufacturer
Is The Device Single Use? Yes
Is this a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial

Patient TREATMENT DATA
Date Received: 08/10/2020 Patient Sequence Number: 1
-
-