It was reported that there was an issue with columbus knee component.There was a revision of a columbus revision implant.Postoperatively at some time, surgeon suspected that the femoral component may be loose.It was, however, very well fixated.The patient had been experiencing pain and tightness in knee, especially during flexion.Surgeon exchanged polyethylene insert from 16mm mc to 12mm hc revision insert and repaired tight patella/femoral compartment.It was noted that during the original procedure, the implant had been put in a bit too tight and the knee was not flexing well.A revision surgery was necessary.The procedure was a success and patient outcome was good.Additional patient information is not available.The removed implant was discarded.The adverse event / malfunction is filed under aag reference (b)(4).
|
Reference code nr133m, device name columbus rev f mc glid.Surf.T3/3+ 16mm, serial number n/a, batch number unknown, udi device identifier (b)(4), udi production identifier unknown, basic udi-di n/a, unit of use udi-di (b)(4), manufacturing date unknown.Investigation: no product at hand, therefore an investigation is not possible.Pictorial documentation: there are no pictures available.Batch history review: due to the fact that no lot number was provided, a review of the device history records for the complained device is not possible.Explanation and rationale: on the basis of the current information and without a product for investigation, a clear conclusion cannot be drawn.According to the provided information a product related error is unlikely: "the original implant that was put in was a bit too tight and the knee was not flexing well.The surgeon took the old 16mm insert out and replaced it with a 12mm." corrective action: according to sa-de13-m-4-2-04-000-0 (corrective action & preventive action) there is no capa necessary.
|