Title further insights into the treatment of perineal hernia based on a the experience of a single tertiary centre source the authors.Colorectal disease published by john wiley & sons ltd on behalf of association of coloproctology of great britain and ireland, volume 22, 2020 (694¿702) date of online acceptance: 8 january 2020.(b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
According to the literature source of a study performed about the evolution of a technique for repair of perineal hernia by analyzing the experience in a tertiary referral center, biological mesh was used in 18 out of a total 34 patients.A cross-linked biological mesh was used in 4 out of the 18 patients and complications were noted.1 patient underwent relaparotomy because of iatrogenic small bowel perforation following adhesiolysis.There were 5 patients that had perineal wound complications.3 had dehiscence, 2 had infection, and 1 had necrosis.All perineal wound infections were successfully treated with antibiotics (2) and percutaneous drainage of fluid collections (1).There were 7 recurrent perineal hernia after a median of 33 months, where recurrence of perineal hernia occurred in 1 out of 4 patients with cross-linked biological mesh.Re-repair after failed biological mesh using transperineal synthetic mesh was performed in four of seven patients.One patient with a cross-linked biological mesh had developed urinary incontinence and pain in a standing position caused by displacement of the mesh, which was treated by laparoscopic re-fixation of the mesh.Perineal infection occurred in one more patient after biological mesh repair following re-repair of a recurrence and was treated by antibiotics.
|