Device is a combination product.Device evaluated by mfr: promus element plus, mr, ous 3.50 x 28 mm stent delivery system was returned for analysis inside another manufactures guidecatheter with a haemostatic valve attached and with two 0.014 inch guidewires.A visual examination of the stent found evidence of damage with the proximal struts bunched distally at the tip of the guidecatheter.The crimped stent outer diameter was within maximum crimped stent profile measurement.The balloon cones were reviewed, and no issues were noted.The balloon wings were tightly wrapped and evenly folded and were not subjected to positive pressure.A visual and microscopic examination of the bumper tip showed no signs of damage.A visual and tactile examination of the hypotube found no issues.A visual examination of the outer and inner lumen and mid-shaft section found no issues along the shaft polymer extrusion.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.
|
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 30-jul-2020.It was reported that crossing difficulties were encountered.The target lesion was located in the severely tortuous and calcified right coronary artery.A 3.50x28mm promus element plus drug-eluting stent was advanced but failed to cross.The device was removed and it was noted that the tip of the stent was damaged.Subsequently, a bigger balloon was used to dilate the lesion and another 3.5x28 stent was advanced but it could not reach the lesion.The procedure was completed by a non-bsc device.No patient complications were reported and the patient was stable.However, returned device analysis revealed stent damaged.
|