|
Catalog Number UNKNOWN |
Device Problems
Structural Problem (2506); Device Tipped Over (2589); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
Patient Problems
Perforation of Vessels (2135); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Reporter occupation: non-healthcare professional.Investigation: it has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information and/or no device failure provided to date.Catalog number and lot number are unknown, however, the alleged tulip is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.
|
|
Event Description
|
It is alleged that the patient received a gunther tulip on (b)(6) 2002.It is alleged that the patient was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested, but not yet provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2002.The patient alleges tilt and vena cava perforation.On (b)(6) 2018, per a report from computed tomography: "there is an ivc filter in place with conical design, the filter appears to be intact with no evidence of fracture.There is approximately 13 of tilt of the filter off the long axis of the ivc on sagittal plane imaging.The apex of the filter is below the renal vein inflow.There s penetration of the struts of the filter through the caval wall, the stripe at the 10 o'clock position is about 4 mm beyond the caval wall, the strut at the 8 o'clock position is about 5 mm beyond the caval wall and the struts at the 2 o'clock and 5 o'clock position are about 2-3 mm beyond the caval wall.Cannot evaluate for ivc thrombosis on this unenhanced exam".¿conclusion: indwelling ivc filter, but no evidence of any filter fracture, migration or embolization.¿.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation: the following allegations have been investigated: vena cava perforation and tilt.Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Filter tilt has been reported.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter); and (or) a failed retrieval attempt.Excessive filter tilt may contribute to difficult or failed retrieval; vena cava wall penetration/perforation; and (or) result in loss of filter efficiency.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: unacceptable filter tilt.Catalog number and lot number are unknown; however, the alleged celect is manufactured and inspected according to controls.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|