The available information was reviewed.The certificate of assurance for cryopatch sg pulmonary hemi-artery 11487387 was reviewed.All attributes identified during inspection were documented appropriately on the certificate of assurance.There are no rejectable attributes.Given the limited information available we know the patient is a 4-month-old presenting with hypoplastic left heart (hypoplastic left heart syndrome, hlhs) and received the 60mm x 4.0cm cryopatch sg pulmonary hemi-artery (sid (b)(6)) on (b)(6) 2020.The implant summary card for this patch indicates the patch was used for a norwood procedure, although no operative notes are available at this time, so it is unknow as to how or where the patch was used during this surgical procedure.Approximately 6 weeks post-operative, it was reported that the patient underwent a heart catherization on (b)(6) 2020.It appears that a stent was placed into the lpa, which presumably is the left pulmonary artery.Stent placement would have been to treat a stenosis in this anatomic location and is considered standard of care.As we do not know where the patch was placed during the incident operation, it remains unclear if the stent placement involved the patch material directly or native artery or a combination of both.Seven weeks later it was reported that this patient underwent a heart transplant procedure, which is a well-established treatment option for patients with hlhs.The root cause of the reported events and the relation to the branch patch cannot be determined from the available information.Fibrosis and technical complications related to surgical technique cannot be excluded.¿graft stricture" is listed in the cryopatch sg ifu as a potential known adverse event associated with the use of patch material in cardiac reconstruction (cryopatch sg ifu).No increase in occurrence has occurred.No new risks were identified.All risks identified have been mitigated as far as possible and residual risk is acceptable.This report is being submitted as required by federal regulations and does not constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reported event.Furthermore, this report reflects the event as alleged by the complainant and does not imply that the information reported to cryolife is accurate or has been confirmed by cryolife.
|