Model Number ES29162400 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Positioning Problem (3009)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 07/31/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The lot number was reviewed for complaint trend, nonconforming report and capa.Devices met specification prior to release and no trends were noted.Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Once our evaluation is complete, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to the available information, the implant was torn apart at both tubing at pump.Left cylinder outside corpora.Left the reservoir on the right; put a new one in on the left.Device was removed and replaced.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Based on the available information, the reported complaint is identified in the risk management documentation and reviewed routinely with management to monitor complaint trends as part of post market surveillance.No corrective action is required at this time.
|
|
Event Description
|
This follow-up mdr is created to document the additional event information received for record #605323.According to the available information the inflatable penile prosthesis was implanted on (b)(6) 2015 removed and replaced on (b)(6) 2020.Information received indicated that the implant was torn apart at both tubing at the pump.The left cylinder outside corpora.The reservoir remained on the right; a new one was placed on the left.The device was not received for evaluation.Without the benefit of analyzing the device, quality cannot confirm any observations or comment on the condition of the product.If the device becomes available, or additional information is received, the complaint will be re-evaluated according to procedures.As examination of the components may not conclusively confirm or disprove the report of the left cylinder outside the corpora, quality accepts the physician¿s observations as to the reason for surgical intervention.A review of the device history record confirmed the devices from this lot met all specifications prior to release.A review of the complaint history database, non-conformances and capas revealed no trends for this lot.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|