• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 209999
Device Problems Loss of Osseointegration (2408); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Injury (2348); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
Event Date 08/06/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
 
Event Description
The doctor revised a mako mck medial pkr due to aseptic loosening of the femoral component.He thinks it was due to cement technique at time of implantation.The construct is two years old.There is visible wear on the poly insert.He believes it is too young to have experienced poly wear, and would like the insert to be examined, assessed and reported back to him please.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: it was reported, "doctor revised a mako mck medial pkr due to aseptic loosening of the femoral component.He thinks it was due to cement technique at time of implantation.The construct is two years old.There is visible wear on the poly insert.He believes it is too young to have experienced poly wear, and would like the insert to be examined, assessed and reported back to him please.¿.Product evaluation and results: review of the case session files was not performed as case session data was not provided.Clinician review: no medical records were received for review with a clinical consultant.Product history review a review of device history records shows that rob423 was inspected on 21 july 2016 and the quality inspection procedures were completed with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review.A search of the complaint database under device identification pn 209999, rob423 reports similar complaints for pka software ¿ other.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to aseptic femoral loosening, the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Further information such as return of the case session/log data, operative reports, progress notes and x-rays are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No additional investigation or specific actions are required.If additional information is received then the complaint will be reopened.Device not returned.
 
Event Description
The doctor revised a mako mck medial pkr due to aseptic loosening of the femoral component.He thinks it was due to cement technique at time of implantation.The construct is two years old.There is visible wear on the poly insert.He believes it is too young to have experienced poly wear, and would like the insert to be examined, assessed and reported back to him please.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3.0 RIO ROBOTIC ARM - MICS
Type of Device
ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
MDR Report Key10477465
MDR Text Key205130415
Report Number3005985723-2020-00291
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
UDI-Device Identifier00848486030407
UDI-Public00848486030407
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/19/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/01/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number209999
Device Catalogue Number209999
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/21/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient Weight91
-
-