• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COCHLEAR LTD NUCLEUS 22; NUCLEUS 22 COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COCHLEAR LTD NUCLEUS 22; NUCLEUS 22 COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number CI22M
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 08/06/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is submitted on september 4, 2020.
 
Event Description
Per the clinic, the patient experienced poor performance with device use and a subsequent loss of clinical benefit.Reprogramming attempts were made; however the issue could not be resolved.The device was explanted on (b)(6) 2020, and the patient was reimplanted with a new device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NUCLEUS 22
Type of Device
NUCLEUS 22 COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
COCHLEAR LTD
1 university avenue
macquarie university, nsw 2109
AS  2109
Manufacturer Contact
weiting zhen
1 university avenue
macquarie university, nsw 2109,
AS   2109,
MDR Report Key10492272
MDR Text Key205661087
Report Number6000034-2020-02310
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P890027
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/17/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/03/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberCI22M
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/26/2020
Date Manufacturer Received08/17/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age33 YR
-
-