The catalog number identified has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the m.R.I.Low-profile implantable port, hickman single-lumen, 6.6f products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510k number for the m.R.I.Low-profile implantable port, hickman single-lumen, 6.6f products is identified in common device name, pro code and pma/510(k).As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Expiry date (01/2022).
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the m.R.I.Low-profile implantable port, hickman single-lumen, 6.6f products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510k number for the m.R.I.Low-profile implantable port, hickman single-lumen, 6.6f products is identified in d2 and g5.H10: manufacturing review:the device history record review was performed for the reported lot number and this lot meets all release criteria.The manufacturing review did not indicate any possible manufacturing issue that could be related to the reported event.Investigation summary:one mri low-profile port, one cath-lock and one catheter was returned for evaluation.Gross visual, microscopic visual, functional and dimensional evaluations were performed.The investigation is confirmed for catheter fracture and deformation issue as a circumferential split was noted to the catheter approximately 4mm from the port body.The port body with attached catheter segment was patent to infusion with a leak noted at the circumferential split.Aspiration was attempted but was unsuccessful; no air was aspirated into the syringe.The investigation is inconclusive for catheter migration as the clinical conditions cannot be replicated.Complaint due to ¿port catheter fractured¿ was confirmed but the exact cause is unknown.According with the photo evaluation performed at reynosa facility and gross visual, microscopic visual, measurements taken, and functional testing performed at bdpi lab the following was concluded: the white catheter was loaded onto the port stem; however, the cath-lock was found to be loosened.A closer view of the catheter showed an uneven circumferential split.Several puncture accesses were noted on the port septum.Tool marks appeared to be present on the surface of the cath-lock.A small indentation was also visible at the proximal end.The inner diameter of the cath-lock was found to be above of specification limits.Blood residue was observed through the sample.Due the fact of the inner diameter of the cath-lock was found above of specification limits during evaluation, an incident report was issued to notify our supplier about this issue.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the port stem outer diameter and cath-lock inner diameter measurements being out of tolerance.Therefore, as the definitive root cause of this damage could not be determined the cause of this condition remains unknown.Labeling review:a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 01/2022),g4,h6(result :2292) h11: b3,h6(method, result and conclusion) h11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|