Model Number N/A |
Device Problem
Fracture (1260)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 08/26/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).(b)(6).Customer has indicated that the product is in process of being returned to zimmer biomet for investigation.Once the investigation has been completed, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the surgeon was doing trials with cps poly.When the surgeon removed it, the golden 10mm spacer came out of the poly and the bottom piece broke.Attempts have been made and no further information has been provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
No further event information available at the time of this report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.
|
|
Event Description
|
No further event information available at the time of this report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4) this follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.Reviewed provided photograph exhibits signs of repeated use and has fractured on the medial side of the post feature all pieces were returned reference attached photograph.Insufficient information provided unable to perform a dhr review.Medical records were not provided.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|
|
Event Description
|
No further event information available at the time of this report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated: b4; b5; g3; g4; g6; h1; h2; h3; h6.Complaint sample was evaluated and the reported event was confirmed.Visual examination of the returned product exhibit signs of repeated use and is fractured on the medial side of the post feature.Review of the device history record (dhr) found parts that were laser etched before an update was implemented, parts were considered wip and were accepted.Fractured tasps were analyzed by optical microscopy revealing hackle marks and river lines in the case of bending overload; and hackle marks, river lines and striations were found in the case of low cycle fatigue culminating in a bending overload failure type.In addition to the visual and optical microscopy analysis, a review of the dhf and dfmea was performed.Ongoing complaint monitoring confirms that the rate of instrument fracture is within the expected risk profile as specified in the dfmea.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated:
b4; b5; d4; d9; g3; g6; h1; h2; h4.
|
|
Event Description
|
No further event information available at the time of this report.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|