• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. MERIDIAN FILTER SYSTEM - FEMORAL; VENA CAVA FILTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. MERIDIAN FILTER SYSTEM - FEMORAL; VENA CAVA FILTER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number MD800F
Device Problems Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906); Positioning Problem (3009); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 11/21/2012
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: a device history record review could not be performed as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.The proximal aspect of the filter was engaged into the left lateral position of the vena cava wall.This did not allow for proper deployment of the legs of the filter.A snare was used to grasp the proximal aspect of the filter with attempts at repositioning of the filter but unsuccessful and the patient experienced pain with attempts at dislodging the already implanted filter.It appeared due proximal aspect of the filter engaged the right renal vein.Despite multiple attempts, this was unsuccessful in repositioning.Then second meridian filter was successfully deployed in an infrarenal position.Malpositioning of initial filter extending into the right renal vein.Approximately five years and eleven months post filter deployment, computed tomography (ct) revealed that inferior vena cava filter was tilted 32 degrees laterally and one of the structs extends laterally and contact the anterior margin of a vertebral body.The inferior portion of the filter demonstrates strut penetration to 4mm.The tip of the filter resides just below the right renal vein.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for positioning issue, deployment issue and perforation of the inferior vena cava (ivc).Based on the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.At some time post filter deployment, it was alleged that the filter struts perforated, deployment issue and positioning issue.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The patient reportedly experienced pain; however, the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MERIDIAN FILTER SYSTEM - FEMORAL
Type of Device
VENA CAVA FILTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer Contact
judith ludwig
1415 w. 3rd street
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key10533651
MDR Text Key206940634
Report Number2020394-2020-05642
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112497
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/15/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/15/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberMD800F
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/19/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age48 YR
-
-