• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL HD EPSCP,4.0,30,167,MITEK; RIGID ENDOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL HD EPSCP,4.0,30,167,MITEK; RIGID ENDOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number 242018
Device Problem Poor Quality Image (1408)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 09/01/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
As reported by the employee via phone, when checking equipment in from a trial during a quality inspection it was found that the sheath is bent and the scope is cloudy.No case.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d10, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: investigation summary: the device was received and evaluated at the service center.The reported complaint that the scope was cloudy was confirmed.The following defects were found with the device upon evaluation : - outer tube damaged, needle outer tube bent.- outer tube damaged, distal tip distal tip has deposits.- optical system, optical components broken lenses in optical system.The device was diagnosed and repaired using spare parts and was tested and found to be working according to specifications.The physical damage to the device and the broken lenses are most likely a result of user mishandling of the device or a probable fall.Improper cleaning / maintenance of the device is most likely the root cause of the deposits on the distal tip.The damaged components would have caused the scope to display a cloudy image as reported by the customer.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device [serial number : (b)(6)] number, and no non-conformances were identified.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 correction narrative: d9: the date device returned to manufacturer has been updated to reflect the correct information.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HD EPSCP,4.0,30,167,MITEK
Type of Device
RIGID ENDOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
MDR Report Key10550182
MDR Text Key207975532
Report Number1221934-2020-02654
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRX
UDI-Device Identifier10886705029150
UDI-Public10886705029150
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K080560
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/01/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/17/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number242018
Device Catalogue Number242018
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/12/2020
Date Manufacturer Received12/18/2020
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-