It was reported that the first pipeline (4.
5 mm x 30 mm) experienced catheter kickback during deployment, and the device became stuck in the xt27 microcatheter.
It was noted there was no friction during delivery, and the catheter tip was under stress due to the proximal curves which resulted in the tip moving and the kickback.
The physician removed the catheter and pipeline, and a new pipeline (4.
75 mm x 20 mm) was used with a phenom 27 microcatheter.
The pipeline was delivered and opened in the desired landing zone.
However, the distal segment of the pipeline failed to open despite more than two resheathing attempts.
The pipeline was not positioned in a bend, and upon opening more of the device, it was noticed the body of the pipeline opened normally.
The pipeline and phenom microcatheter were removed from the patient.
A third pipeline (5 mm x 20 mm) experienced the same event as the second pipeline: the dista l end failed to open.
After resheathing multiple times without success, the physician removed this pipeline as well.
A competitor's product was then used to complete the procedure with no reported issues.
It was indicated that all devices were prepared as per the instructions for use (ifu), and no patient symptoms or further complications were reported as a result of this event.
The patient was undergoing surgery for treatment of a saccular, unruptured aneurysm of the left c6 internal carotid artery with a max diameter of 30 mm and a >10 mm neck diameter.
It was noted the patient's vessel tortuosity was moderate.
Refer to manufacturer report 2029214-2020-00983 for details pertaining to the related reportable event.
|